Politic365

 
 


Policy

5:31pm April 24, 2014

Incentive Auctions: We Don’t Need a Repeat of September 11th

police-officers

I lived in Maryland during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.  To fill the need to give something back to the community during this time, I took the opportunity to volunteer with the Civil Air Patrol, the civilian auxiliary of the United States Air Force.   As part of flight and ground crews, I helped run communications between two squadrons and the U.S. Coast Guard for surveillance of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge.

A six-hour stint communicating between the Coast Guard and CAP planes was straight forward, but multiply those efforts by a factor of a thousand; that may reflect the communications needs that big metropolitan areas like my home city, Atlanta, would face on congested interstates from a terrorist incident prior to a ball game.

This is why I support the creation and deployment of a nationwide, interoperable broadband communications network.  Communications during a catastrophic incident should not be hampered by an inability of public safety units to talk to each other and send valuable information simultaneously across jurisdictional lines.

In 2012, Congress passed and the President signed into law the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012.  The Act laid out the framework for building a broadband network that would ease the ability of first responders to communicate and provide the services necessary to keep American citizens safe.

To provide the $7 billion needed to build the network, Congress authorized an incentive auction that gives broadcast television stations the opportunity to put up for sale their spectrum licenses and collect some of the proceeds.  A successful auction should cover the price tag, but with all expectations there is a fly in the ointment, and in this case it’s calls for restrictions on who may participate in the auction.

Sprint and T-Mobile want the Federal Communications Commission to limit the amount of spectrum (access to the airwaves) that carriers AT&T and Verizon can bid for.  This request not only flies in the face of Congress’ intent to have a bidding process open to all willing participants, but it also dispels with common sense.

First, if you want to optimize the amount of revenue an auction can rake in, you need to allow all interested bidders to participate.  They want the spectrum and are willing to pay for it.   The successful build out of the public safety network will not happen if enough money is not raised.

Second, if you cap the amount of spectrum AT&T or Verizon are able to bid on, you deny access to higher quality services by a significant number of wireless subscribers.  Why should these consumers be denied better services because of they exercised their rights to choose a larger carrier?

Third, broadcasters will have an incentive to give up their spectrum licenses if they are assured that sufficient revenue to cover their demands is being raised by the auction.  As the certainty of higher revenues collected increases, chances increase that more broadcasters will participate in the auction.

We don’t need a repeat of September 11, 2001.  The FCC should vigorously pursue Congress’ intent to keep the incentive auction open to all potential participants.  Let’s stay focused on the goal of protecting American lives.



About the Author

Alton Drew
Alton Drew provides advocacy, legal and legislative analysis, and legislative monitoring services for not-for-profit associations and foundations with a particular emphasis on broadband adoption, spectrum acquisition, and capital accumulation. Using various social media platforms, Mr. Drew amplifies messages for not-for-profit associations and foundations as part of their online media campaigns. Follow him on Twitter @altondrew; Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/alton.drew.5; or visit him at www.lawandpoliticsofbroadband.com or www.lawandpoliticsofcapital.com.




 
 

 
computer_science

National Minority Organizations Urge Renewed Focus on Broadband Adoption Amid Net Neutrality Debate

Forty-two national minority organizations representing diverse, multicultural communities filed comments in the Federal Communications Commission’s open Internet proceeding focused on protecting some of the country’s most v...
by Kristal High
0

 
 
congress_1

Members of Congress Share Title II Concerns with FCC Chairman

As the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Chairman Thomas Wheeler mull over the best way to re-implement “net neutrality” rules, the possibility of “Title II” reclassification has come up often.  To many, incl...
by Politic365 Staff
6

 
 
netflix_hq

Netflix’s Flip-Flop on Net Neutrality

Netflix must have been anticipating this year’s World Cup, preparing for it like some soccer athletes by practicing a “dive” or “flop”; feigning some injury in order to get a free kick.  The flop I’m referring to i...
by Alton Drew
0

 

Advertisement
 
kevin-spacey

Netflix Plays Creative to Gain Competitive Advantage

House of Cards is amazing – how could it not be? Anything with Kevin Spacey has a good chance of becoming cinematic gold – remember his turn as Keyser Söze in the Usual Suspects. Orange is the New Black cemented ...
by Kristal High
1

 
 
competition-house-energy-commerce

Convergence, Competition, and Consumer Protection Should Dictate Communications Policy

Convergence is the hallmark of the modern communications marketplace.  It may have made sense to view and regulate various communications platforms as distinct silos back in 1996, but today the realities of this industry are f...
by Kristal High
0

 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>