Politic365

 
 


Culture

5:19pm January 31, 2014

Three New Mandatory Minimums Added to Major Criminal Justice Reform Bill

grassley7

As the Senate Judiciary Committee moved the Smarter Sentencing Act to the Senate floor, Senate Democrats allowed three new mandatory minimum penalties to be included in the bill.   The Smarter Sentencing Act would significantly lower mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses.  It would also allow judges to use more discretion in sentencing for non-violent drug crimes.  The bill, along with the Justice Safety Valve Act, is a major change in direction in criminal justice reform.

Mandatory minimum sentencing ushered in an age of historic levels of incarceration in America over the last 30 years. The U.S. continues to lead the world in the rate of incarceration.  There are now over 2.2 million people behind bars at an annual cost of over $68 billion per year. The federal prison population has grown over 800% since 1980.

RELATED: NAACP’s Criminal Justice Fact Sheet features incredible stats

There were three new mandatory minimum penalties added to the Smarter Sentencing Act yesterday by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).  All but two of the ten Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee voted in favor of the three new mandatory minimums — one, which focused on terrorism, was agreed to by voice vote.

drug-facts2The only three Senators who voted against the new mandatory minimum penalties were Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, Democrat Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Tea Party Republican Mike Lee.  That fact should be duly noted by anyone who cares about criminal justice policy in America.  Even the bill’s primary sponsor,  Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) a Democrat, voted in favor of the two new mandatory minimum penalties unlike Republican Sen. Lee, who voted against them all. 

“The American Civil Liberties Union supports the base bill but opposes all new mandatory minimums,” the ACLU said in a press release.  Families Against Mandatory Minimums (FAMM) made a similar statement saying, ““Although FAMM would prefer the total repeal of mandatory minimum sentences, this bill is a necessary compromise that will help address many of the drivers of our exploding prison populations.”

There has been a major policy shift on mandatory minimum sentencing with everyone from George Will to Sen. Rand Paul and Ed Meese opposing them. Those conservatives have joined lawmakers like Reps. Bobby Scott and John Conyers who have been opposing them for years. Rep Scott is the primary sponsor, along with Republican Raul Labrador, of the House version of the Smarter Sentencing Act.

The three mandatory minimum amendments were authored by Grassley focused on sexual abuse, terrorism and domestic violence.  Ironically, Grassley voted against the Violence Against Women Act in 2013.  The law focuses over a billion dollars on prosecution of violent crimes against women.

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to work on the Justice Safety Valve Act, which would give judges more discretion in sentencing, next.



About the Author

Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke is a writer and political analyst. She created the blog Crewof42, a blog that covers African American members of Congress, in 2009. Ms. Burke appears regularly on NewsOneNow with Roland Martin and on WHUR, WURD, and WVON. Ms. Burke has enjoyed employment at USAToday.com and ABC News. She holds a B.A. in History from The American University. E-mail anytime: LBurke007@gmail.com. Twitter: @Crewof42




 
 

 
Kay Hagan immigrants

Immigrant activists target Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan with billboard campaign

This week a group of immigrant activists in North Carolina unveiled a billboard campaign taking aim at Democratic Senator Kay Hagan for her immigration positions. Hagan was one of the five Democratic senators who opposed the DR...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 
 
o1

Why Do Democrats Think They Can Bash Obama and Get Black Votes?

Here are a few election time questions to think over: Why in the world do Democrats think they can bash President Obama and his policies and still win Black votes?  Why should Black voters be motivated to turnout after months...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
0

 
 
7432022562_3733c11c35_k

Supreme Court is allowing Texas to use strict voter ID law in Nov. election

On Saturday, the Supreme Court gave Texas the approval to move forward with implementing a strict voter identification law in the upcoming midterm election. Adam Liptak for The New York Times wrote: “The law, enacted in 2...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 

Advertisement
 
mayor1nyc

Noerdlinger Obsession Verifies NY Reporters Make Way Under $170,000

“It’s none of your f—ing business.” — New York City Mayor Ed Koch.  If you want to learn every detail of every parking ticket or unpaid debt of the Chief of Staff of the wife of the Mayor of New York and her boy...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 
 
young-black-woman-texting

Rising Wireless Taxes Could Jeopardize Mobile Use

Economist Scott Mackey, in conjunction with the Tax Foundation, an independent tax policy research organization, recently released Wireless Taxation in the United States 2014. On average, each month when people pay their wirele...
by Kristal High
1

 




One Comment


  1. ana

    Mandatory Minimums: The Drug War and Mass Incarceration; Attorney General Eric Holder and The Obama Administration should implement a way to reduce the budget of The Federal Bureau of Prisons,which grew by[4%] in this year of budgetary austerity…They should find a way to”not”open that New Federal Supermax Prison in Illinois,or a way to close existing torture facility like the one in Florence,Colorado…They should look for ways to use federal law enforcement and corrections funding to pressure States to close their Supermaxes,or encourage them to provide educational opportunities and decent medical care to the[2]million plus in State and Local Prisons and Jails…These are practical measures that Attorney General Eric Holder and President Obama have the power to do…After the[2010]passage of The Fair Sentencing Act,and Court decisions which say its provisions ought to be retroactive back to the[1980s] the sentences of the[5,000,[19,000],or[12,000] depending on the degree of retroactivity applied,who have already served excess prison time under the old and outlawed[100 to 1] crack vs powder cocaine penalties…Everyone will be held Responsible and Accountable.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>