Politic365

 
 


Voting Laws

7:05pm June 28, 2013

Top 10 Lines from Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Red Hot Voting Rights Dissent

ruthB
In what was more of an open letter in the outline of a middle finger to conservative members of the court, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a hotly worded dissenting opinion against the conservative majority’s gutting of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. A day after Justice Samuel Alito rolled his eyes as Ginsburg read her lone dissent on the court’s 7-1 affirmative action ruling, the eighty year old Associate Justice didn’t lose a step in making that point during her 37 page dissent. You can read the entire dissent opinion here.
The top 10 lines from Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s hot Voting Rights Dissent:
1. “Throwing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”
2. ”The sad irony of today’s decision lies in its utter failure to grasp why the Voting Rights Act has proven effective. The Court appears to believe that he Voting Rights Act’s success in eliminating the specific devices extant in 1965 means that pre clearance is no longer needed… with this belief and the argument derived from it, history repeats itself.”3. ”Just as buildings in California have a greater need to be earthquake­ proofed, places where there is greater racial polarization in voting have a greater need for prophylactic measures to prevent purposeful race discrimination.”3. ”Alabama’s sorry history of Section 2 violations alone provides sufficient justification for Congress’ determination in 2006 that the State should remain subject to Section 5′s preclearance requirement.”

4. “The Court’s opinion can hardly be described as an exemplar of restrained and moderate decision making. Quite the opposite. Hubris is a fit word for today’s demolition of the Voting Rights Act.”
5. ”Between 1982 and 2006, DOJ objections blocked over 700 voting changes based on a determination that the changes were discriminatory.”
6. ”The Court disregards what Congress set about to do in enacting the Voting Rights Act. That extraordinary legislation scarcely stopped at the particular tests and devices that happened to exist in 1965. The grand aim of the act is to secure to align our polity equal citizenship stature and a voice in our democracy undiluted by race.”7. ”True, conditions in the South have impressively improved since passage of the Voting Rights Act. Congress noted this improvement and found that the VRA was the driving force behind it. 2006 Reauthorization ?. But Congress also found that voting discrimination had evolved into subtler second-generation barriers, and that eliminating preclearance would risk loss of the gains that had been made.”
8. Contrary to the spin from some conservatives who are trying to protect Republicans at a time when the party is losing voters and making enemies of a growing Hispanic population, there are many recent examples of voter suppression and vote related race games. On pages 16 and 17 of her dissent, Ginsburg cited several examples. Here’s a winner: ”In 2001, the mayor and all-white five-member Board of Aldermen of Kilmichael, Mississippi, abruptly canceled the town’s election after ‘an unprecedented number’ of AfricanAmerican candidates announced they were running for office. DOJ required an election, and the town elected its first black mayor and three black aldermen.” (see pages 16 and 17 for more examples)
9. ”The Court’s opinion in this case contains not a word explaining why Congress lacks the power to subject to preclearance the particular plaintiff that initiated this lawsuit — Shelby County, Alabama. The reason for the Court’s silence is apparent, for as applied to Shelby County, the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance requirement is hardly contestable.Alabama is home to Selma, site of the “Bloody Sunday” beatings of civil-rights demonstrators that served as the catalyst for the VRA’s enactment. Following those events, Martin Luther King, Jr., led a march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama’s capital, where he called for passage of the Voting Rights Act. If the Act passed, he foresaw, progress could be made even in Alabama, but there had to be a steadfast national commitment to see the task through to completion. In King’s words, “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. History has proved King right.”

10. There is no question, moreover, that the covered jurisdictions have a unique history of problems with racial discrimination in voting. Ante, at 12-13. Consideration of this long history, still in living memory, was altogether appropriate. The Court criticizes Congress for failing to recognize that “history did not end in 1965. But the Court ignores that “what’s past is prologue.”



About the Author

Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke is a writer and political analyst. She created Crewof42, a blog that covers African American members of Congress, in 2009. Ms. Burke appears regularly on NewsOneNow with Roland Martin and on WHUR in Washington, D.C., WURD in Philadelphia, and WVON in Chicago. Ms. Burke has enjoyed employment at USAToday.com and ABC News. She holds a B.A. in History from The American University. E-mail anytime: LBurke007@gmail.com. Twitter: @Crewof42. Instagram: LVB325.




 
 

 
ed-big

Remembering Senator Edward Brooke III

By Nicholas Buford Just a few short days after the start of 2015, a political giant was called from work on Earth. Edward Brooke, the first Black United States Senator since Reconstruction, passed away in his Florida home. Br...
by Guest Contributor
0

 
 
cornyn56

Republican Senator Drops “Civil Rights and Human Rights” from Committee Name

Just Another Moment in GOP Growth and Opportunity. Just in case anyone is wondering how the new Republican controlled Senate will deal with civil rights issues, wonder no more.  There’s a new Republican Chairman of the ...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 
 
ferg87

Only African American on St. Louis Board of Elections Removed

“When you have a county that has at least 45 percent minority population you would hope that would be reflected on the St. Louis County Board of Elections. As of right now every single member of the St. Louis County Board...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
2

 

Advertisement
 
AC-Ferg-1

Positive Vibes From Ferguson Activists After Dinner With Black Caucus

Youth Movement.  ”Where do I start?  How about undefinable frustration? It seems we can’t even catch our breath from our first tragedy before being hit by another gut-punch from a second, third, and fourth.  The nam...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
3

 
 
ferg8

Eight Ferguson Related Bills in Congress

FERGUSON LEGISLATIVE UPDATE.  Think that Ferguson related legislation can’t pass the Republican controlled House and Senate? Think again. What is the one issue that congressional Republicans and Democrats have found rar...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
6

 




3 Comments


  1. [...] laws.” The key word here is “history,” and in her dissenting opinion, Ginsberg threw legendary SCOTUS shade at her colleagues that voted against the provision, citing its continuing importance in [...]


  2. [...] laws.” The key word here is “history,” and in her dissenting opinion, Ginsberg threw legendary SCOTUS shade at her colleagues that voted against the provision, citing its continuing importance in [...]


  3. [...] voter ID laws.” The key word here is “history,” and in her dissenting opinion, Ginsberg threw legendary SCOTUS shade at her colleagues that voted against the provision, citing its continuing importance in [...]



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>