Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court Gains New Rival: Governor Garcia Padilla

Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court Gains New Rival: Governor Garcia Padilla

1291
3
SHARE

Puerto Rico’s ruling party, the Popular Democratic Party, lost little time in delivering a first strike against the opposition party dominated Supreme Court when it enacted Act 18 of 2013, aimed at limiting the Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction and right to review appellate cases by interlocutory petitions. The legislative strike came at a time when several public employees filed a lawsuit challenging Governor Garcia Padilla’s public pension reform. Under Act 18, parties could no longer certify a case straight to the Supreme Court from the Court of First Instance, while avoiding the intermediate court under the special writ of certification. The challenge to the pension reform quickly rose to the Supreme Court who in turn, gave Governor Garcia Padilla a 6-3 strike down.

The Court, strictly on party lines, ruled that Act 18 was unconstitutional in the manner that its limitation of the Court’s jurisdiction went beyond what the Constitution allows for. In a decision filled with strong jabs from each side of the aisle, the Court admonished the Governor for trying to curtail its jurisdiction in what the majority saw was a political attack. Governor Garcia Padilla, who is an attorney, criticized the Court, going as far as calling them “enemies of Puerto Rico”. While the Puerto Rico State Bar chose to remain silent as to the Governor’s unprecedented attack on the Court, Pedro Pierluisi (Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner) came out against the Governor, calling for respect to our Court amongst whatever disagreement one may have. Following the Court’s decision, the PPD’s Party Secretary vowed to present a bill to undue the Court’s recent expansion under Governor Luis Fortuño. The bill would reduce the Court to its size prior to the 2010 expansion (from 9 to 7), effectively eliminating the last two justices appointed to the Court under Governor Fortuño. The bill ignores the fact that the Constitution of Puerto Rico only allows for the change in size of the Court at the petition of the Court, followed by the corresponding legislative action.

In another strike against the Court, Governor Garcia Padilla doubled down on his attack on the Court, claiming that it alone would be to blame if Puerto Rico’s credit rating was downgraded to junk as a result of a hypothetical strike down by the Court of Governor Garcia Padilla’s pension reform bill. The attack is misplaced given that the Court is not responsible for decades of borrowing with no sensible repayment plan in sight, but it (the attack) plays well on the PPD’s more combative wing, which strongly opposes the Statehood party appointed majority in the Court.

As Governor Garcia Padilla (and his PPD dominated legislative majorities) strive to keep the house in order, amidst an economy in recession dipping into depression and less income to tax in order to balance (or try to) the budget, more attacks on the Court can be expected. The Supreme Court gives the PPD the perfect scapegoat as it’s the only branch in government which they do not control and has enough power to throw a major road block on Governor Garcia Padilla’s legislative plan.

Supporters of the Statehood party, on the other hand, will be forced to defend the Court’s majority at all times, given that the Court will now symbolize the last bastion of power held by the Statehood party for the next four years. If the Court does strike down the pension reform bill, it would galvanize both sides of the aisle. The PPD would move to further demonize the Court while the Statehood party praise the Court’s move given its opposition to the pension reform bill.

As the political battles on the Island ensue, the Court will become a more prominent target from the PPD, and its legitimacy will continue to be attacked by those in power.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Governor Padilla and his PPD have crossed a line. I don’t remember our tenous democracy being attacked in such a vicious and obvious way. I’m stunned. The ruling party forgets they are not heirs to absolute power, but temporary administrators of a rundown island with ambiguous political status. We need bright statesmen, not petty brawlers. Puerto Rico is a complex puzzle. If they honestly think they are helping our island or helping our people someone please tell them they are going the WRONG WAY!! It is shameful. Attacking the judicial branch is nothing new; calling them out and attempting to limit their constitutionally protected powers because they don’t agree with the administration’s policies is barbaric. Governors of all colors come and go, but the judicial branch is permanent. Wow.

    • Yes but this is the PPD we are talking about here … you know the same party that came up with the Gag Law. The PPD is merely trying to solidify their power.

      Oh need I mention how they went after Charlie Rodriguez for going against the party line regarding the status referendum (he said to vote no/independence [free association] instead of yes/blank ballot) … I am 100% pro-statehood but that was incredibly disgusting. Free speech is human right … even if it offends Garcia Padilla and the real party president Rafael Hernandez Colon.

      • Another thing, Garcia Padilla’s proposition that the diaspora be allowed to vote in any future status referendums is absurd. This would be incredibly complicated and logistically impossible. I believe only persons registered to vote in Puerto Rico should have a say in Puerto Rico’s affairs. Furthermore members of Congress are not to keen on the idea except for Serrano, Gutierrez, and Velasquez … when Velasquez proposed this as an amendment for the 2010 PR Democracy Act it was rejected by just about everyone on the floor – 11 to 387. This idea is also rejected by the White House Status Report.

        I wonder if Garcia Padilla is proposing this as to purposely derail any future referendums?

LEAVE A REPLY