Politic365

 
 


Grito

4:38pm March 25, 2013

Death Penalty Strikes Out Again in Puerto Rico

2012-09-27t000937z_249793774_gm1e89r0mcz01_rtrmadp_3_puertorico

On Saturday, a lone juror in a criminal case before the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico was all that stood between the Alexis Candelario Santana and the death penalty. The Federal Prosecutors wanted to get a death penalty conviction for a man responsible for more murders than Jeffrey Dahmer had victims and the mastermind behind the “Tombola massacre” that shocked Puerto Rico in 2009. The lone juror, a woman according to El Nuevo Día, was the reason Candelario will now face life in prison, instead of the death penalty. Governor Garcia Padilla lauded the decision by the jury, stating:

“I express my most profound respect to the jury for the decision it has taken. With it they have sustained the conviction of the Puerto Rican people that capital punishment should not be applied under any circumstances…”

While Pedro Pierluisi, president of the Statehood Party and representative before Congress for Puerto Rico, coincided with the Governor and added that the verdict is proof that Puerto Ricans will not impose the death penalty under any circumstance. That said, the verdict brings several issues to light in Puerto Rico.

The first issue one must address in the death penalty debate in Puerto Rico is the federal/state divide. Namely, Puerto Rico’s Constitution prohibits the death penalty, while the federal Constitution allows it. Until the 1990s, federal prosecutors did not seek the death penalty in Puerto Rico. However, following a court decision in 2001 where the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that the legal framework concerning Puerto Rico’s relationship with the U.S. did not bar the death penalty in federal cases, prosecutors have been more aggressive in seeking the death penalty here on the Island (this being the 5th time it has been placed before a local jury). Some, including the State Bar Association, view the local constitution as a clear impediment to the Federal Government’s quest to impose the death penalty, ignoring the fact that the federal constitution has no duty to pay heed to the local constitution. Opponents of the death penalty argue that Puerto Ricans by and large reject it, and that it has no place in our culture even though the last two cases were decided by a single juror (instead of an overwhelming rejection by said jury).

Another point to consider is the contradiction between the message made by opponents of the death penalty and the facts on the ground. Following the verdict, opponents cheered the decision and lauded Puerto Rico’s commitment to civil values, respect for life and “civilization.” However, this “respect to civil values” goes ignored in the spiraling crime rate faced by the island, with over 1,000 murders per year for the past 2 years, without counting the intolerable levels of gun and gang violence, rape and home invasions. To those who lauded Puerto Rican’s value based on a jury verdict, the message seems to be lost on the victims of everyday crime. Puerto Rico has, contrary to what Pierluisi claims, a culture that is highly tolerable of death when one sees the crime wave hitting the Island, not only in the past few years, but in the past decades. Additionally, the last two cases have rejected the death penalty not because a majority of jurors rejected it, but because one single juror did not agree. This means that out of 12 jurors, 11 were ready to pull the “switch” on the accused, hardly a strong showing of a culture that rejects the death penalty.

The issue will no doubt come again as the local federal court has another case in which the death penalty is being sought in the next month. Puerto Rico will have another chance to either hold the line on its opposition to the death penalty, or break with its history and embrace stronger tactics in the fight against crime.

 



About the Author

jeanvidal





 
 

 
6316413344_309861dd7d_b

Senate passes bill expanding drug war with Transnational Drug Trafficking Act

On Monday, the Senate passed the Transnational Drug Trafficking Act, which expands the war on drugs. This law gives the Justice Department the authority to prosecute drug traffickers from foreign countries. The law also ensures...
by Adriana Maestas
1

 
 
193624822_de6bb92462_z

Government funding bill with Wall Street giveaways passes in House

On Thursday night, the House of Representatives voted to pass a government funding bill, but some of the more progressive members of the House stood in opposition to this spending bill because it contained policy riders that be...
by Adriana Maestas
1

 
 
5708625905_502f6d8f08_b

Latino support for President Obama up, and majority of Americans still support path to legalization

The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press released some new data today from a recently conducted survey that shows a mixed response from the public for the President’s recent executive action expanding the numb...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 

Advertisement
 
4bill

Four Ferguson Related Bills in Congress

Four Ferguson Related Bills in Congress. This week will likely be the last week of the 113th Congress. When Congress reconvenes again in January, Republicans will control both the House and the Senate. But the last week of a C...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 
 
eric3

First #Ferguson Bill Set to Become Law: Deaths in Custody Reporting Act

First Piece of #Ferguson Related Legislation Passes Congress and Will Become Law. H.R. 1447, the Death in Custody Reporting Act, authored by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), passed the Senate (Wednesday) tonight and is on its way to be...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 




One Comment


  1. Get one of your. judges to mandate that a Dr
    can only administor the chemicals that will lead to deth. then because the hip .oath do no harm. well put it on hold



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>