5:47pm February 27, 2013

Section 5 in Jeopardy as Kennedy, Scalia and Roberts Question Vote Protections


imes change,” said Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Supreme Court’s swing vote.

“Perpetuation of racial entitlement,” Justice Antonin Scalia called Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

“Is it the government’s submission that the citizens in the South are more racist than the citizens in the North?” Chief Justice John Roberts asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

With that, it was made clear this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court that Sections 4 and 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act are in jeopardy.  Conservative justices on the Supreme Court, most notably Justice Kennedy, questioned whether the law was still relevant during oral arguments in the case of Shelby County vs. Holder.

“Following through on the deep constitutional concerns stated in its prior Northwest Austin decision, a majority of the Court seems committed to invalidating Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act and requiring Congress to revisit the formula for requiring preclearance of voting changes. The vote seems quite likely to be five to four,” reported Tom Goldstein of SCOTUS blog.

Voting rights and voting ID laws were a huge issue during the last year as President Obama made his way to re-election.  Over thirty states across the U.S. suddenly decided that it was time to change their voting laws and strengthen requirements for people to cast a vote at the ballot box.

“It’s an old disease. It’s gotten a lot better. A lot better. But it’s still there,” said Justice Stephen Breyer as he talked on efforts to stop minorities from voting.  If today’s vote breakdown is any evidence, the vote will be 5-4 in favor or Shelby County and against the Department of Justice.

“I think it’s a safe prediction to say that the Voting Rights Act as it now stands is not going to survive. It’s clear there are five votes to strike down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. The question is how far will the Supreme Court go,” reported NBC justice correspondent Pete Williams.

National Urban League President Marc Morial argued the Roberts court would be the second version of the court that decided the Plessy vs. Ferguson case.

”The arguments that we heard this morning gives us cause to pause and hope that we will not have to return to the streets to secure voting rights,” said Rev. Al Sharpton.  In a case of fascinating timing, a dedication of the Rosa Parks statue took place at the same time the U.S. Supreme Court began oral arguments on a case that could gut a cornerstone of voting rights in America.

About the Author

Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke is a writer, speaker, strategist, comms expert and political analyst. She created Crewof42.com, a blog that covers the work of Black members of Congress, in 2009. She's been a former staffer for the Senate Democratic Policy Committee and Director of Communications for Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN) and has had a very diverse career in politics and media. Ms. Burke appears regularly on NewsOneNow with Roland Martin on TVOne and has been seen on MSNBC. She holds a B.A. in History from The American University. E-mail anytime: LBurke007@gmail.com. Twitter: @Crewof42. Instagram: LVB325. The ideas and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and have complete editorial independence from any Politic365 partners, sponsors, or advertisers.



Voting: Alabama Rep. Sewell Demands AG Lynch Investigate DMV Closures in Black Communities

A Blast From the Jim Crow Past.  Alabama Congresswoman Terri Sewell released a letter that she has sent to Attorney General Loretta Lynch.  In her letter to the Attorney General, Rep. Sewell is calling for the Department of J...
by Lauren Victoria Burke


After 5-Month-Old is Shot Dead in Cleveland, LeBron James Speaks Out on Guns

Basketball icon LeBron James is speaking out for more gun control after the shooting death of 5-month-old Aavielle Wakefield in Cleveland. James’ involvement is politics is fairly rare but he did use his stature to put a...
by Lauren Victoria Burke

Criminal Justice Reform

Senators Finally Offer Justice Bill

Though the details have been kept secret until a press conference today, members of the Senate led by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) are planning to announce new justice reform legislatio...
by Lauren Victoria Burke



Everyone Has So Much Grand Advice for #BlackLivesMatter, John Lewis Comments

Rep. John Lewis has nothing critical to say about #BlackLivesMatter… and he’s been there.  It’s impressive how much unsolicited advice the Black Lives Matter movement and leaders have gotten. Focus on this, d...
by Lauren Victoria Burke


The Gaping Hole in Pope Francis’ Anti-Poverty Agenda

By Jessica González-Rojas “This papacy begins with a name,” wrote Howard Chua-Eoan and Elizabeth Dias in their 2013 “Person of the Year” profile of Pope Francis for Time Magazine. Indeed, when the man formerly known ...
by Guest Contributor


One Comment

  1. Realista

    How can Justice Scalia say: “The Right to Vote may be a “racial entitlement”,

    Since by Definition: the Right to Vote does not preference one race or ethnicity over any other, and provides Fair access to All citizens.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>