Politic365

 
 


Headline

5:47pm February 27, 2013

Section 5 in Jeopardy as Kennedy, Scalia and Roberts Question Vote Protections

roberts-kennedy1
“T

imes change,” said Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Supreme Court’s swing vote.

“Perpetuation of racial entitlement,” Justice Antonin Scalia called Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

“Is it the government’s submission that the citizens in the South are more racist than the citizens in the North?” Chief Justice John Roberts asked Solicitor General Donald Verrilli.

With that, it was made clear this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court that Sections 4 and 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act are in jeopardy.  Conservative justices on the Supreme Court, most notably Justice Kennedy, questioned whether the law was still relevant during oral arguments in the case of Shelby County vs. Holder.

“Following through on the deep constitutional concerns stated in its prior Northwest Austin decision, a majority of the Court seems committed to invalidating Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act and requiring Congress to revisit the formula for requiring preclearance of voting changes. The vote seems quite likely to be five to four,” reported Tom Goldstein of SCOTUS blog.

Voting rights and voting ID laws were a huge issue during the last year as President Obama made his way to re-election.  Over thirty states across the U.S. suddenly decided that it was time to change their voting laws and strengthen requirements for people to cast a vote at the ballot box.

“It’s an old disease. It’s gotten a lot better. A lot better. But it’s still there,” said Justice Stephen Breyer as he talked on efforts to stop minorities from voting.  If today’s vote breakdown is any evidence, the vote will be 5-4 in favor or Shelby County and against the Department of Justice.

“I think it’s a safe prediction to say that the Voting Rights Act as it now stands is not going to survive. It’s clear there are five votes to strike down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. The question is how far will the Supreme Court go,” reported NBC justice correspondent Pete Williams.

National Urban League President Marc Morial argued the Roberts court would be the second version of the court that decided the Plessy vs. Ferguson case.

”The arguments that we heard this morning gives us cause to pause and hope that we will not have to return to the streets to secure voting rights,” said Rev. Al Sharpton.  In a case of fascinating timing, a dedication of the Rosa Parks statue took place at the same time the U.S. Supreme Court began oral arguments on a case that could gut a cornerstone of voting rights in America.



About the Author

Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke
Lauren Victoria Burke is a writer and political analyst. She created the blog Crewof42, a blog that covers African American members of Congress, in 2009. Ms. Burke appears regularly on NewsOneNow with Roland Martin and on WHUR, WURD, and WVON. Ms. Burke has enjoyed employment at USAToday.com and ABC News. She holds a B.A. in History from The American University. E-mail anytime: LBurke007@gmail.com. Twitter: @Crewof42




 
 

 
12528079994_effe7e5af7_k

New Poll: Millennials considered swing vote in upcoming election

On Wednesday, the Harvard Institute of Politics (IOP) released a new poll of 18-29 year olds. Here are some of the key findings about America’s largest generation and how they might vote next Tuesday: 50% of 18-29 year ol...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 
 
crop1

Record Number of African Americans Running Statewide in 2014

A record number of African Americans are running statewide for the midterm elections.  Below is a chart of the candidates who will be on the ballot on Tuesday.
by Lauren Victoria Burke
0

 
 
dccc1

DCCC Begs for Cash Again, Finally Mentions a Black Person Running for Congress

The Hill, Mike Lillis: ”Democrats have raised $163 million to the GOP’s $125 million. That’s an enormous discrepancy, especially considering that Republicans control 34 more House seats than Democrats … The DCC...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
0

 

Advertisement
 
2278029793_90f710fd59_b

Will Latina Voices Be Heard on Election Day?

By Maria Elena Perez, National Institute of Reproductive Health As we come to yet another important election season, in which our basic right to choose hangs in the balance, we must ask: what is at stake for Latinas’ access t...
by Guest Contributor
0

 
 
Kay Hagan immigrants

Immigrant activists target Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan with billboard campaign

This week a group of immigrant activists in North Carolina unveiled a billboard campaign taking aim at Democratic Senator Kay Hagan for her immigration positions. Hagan was one of the five Democratic senators who opposed the DR...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 




One Comment


  1. Realista

    How can Justice Scalia say: “The Right to Vote may be a “racial entitlement”,

    Since by Definition: the Right to Vote does not preference one race or ethnicity over any other, and provides Fair access to All citizens.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>