Politic365

 
 


National

3:50pm February 12, 2013

Georgia’s Plan to Execute Mentally Disabled Man Raises Moral Questions

chair2

The state of Georgia has rescheduled the execution of a mentally handicapped inmate for February 19. Warren Lee Hill Jr. was scheduled for execution last summer; however, the Georgia Department of Corrections changed the lethal injection process and delayed his execution.

The same day that the lethal injection protocol was examined, a petition for considering Hill’s mental retardation,  was denied, despite his IQ of 70.

Hill’s attorney, Brian Kammer, told Politic365 that he wants the courts, the department of corrections and the clemency board “to err on the side of humaneness and mercy” in cases similar to Hill’s.

Admittedly, Hill’s story is troubling. He was already imprisoned for a life sentence for the murder of his girlfriend when he was found guilty of killing a prison inmate and sentenced to death more than 20 years ago.

But, Hill also elucidates questions of ethics and crime. As public opinions demonstrate a divided America with regard to the death penalty, some might wonder what average Americans think about similar issues.

The Pew Research Center reported that public opinions on the death penalty haven’t changed much recently, but capital punishment is far less supported than it was in the mid 1990s. More than 60% of adults polled in 2011 favor the death penalty for people convicted of murder. In the mid 1990s, that statistic was nearly 80%.

Pew’s findings highlight change. Of respondents who do not support the death penalty, 27% cited moral concerns. Another 27% expressed concerns about the justice system putting innocent people to death.

But, the intersection of cognition and crime could create gray areas that are difficult to assess. And what about the mental awareness to accompany one’s acts?

Kammer didn’t couch his concerns in pardoning Hill’s past actions or entitling his client to a scot-free existence. If Hill gets clemency, he will live the basic life of an incarcerated person.

“The system will house him and minimally care for him for the rest of his life if he receives clemency or a court vacates the death sentence.”  Even so, rudimentary care seems out of reach to Hill, who Kammer shared is pessimistic about his chances.

Hill’s case has been chronicled in the media and championed by human rights watchdogs. It called more attention to Georgia’s high standard of proof for proving mental retardation, the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. Georgia is the only state in the United States employing the highest burden of proof for mental retardation.

“I think that it may be impossible to satisfy the reasonable doubt standard for any mental health diagnosis,” Kammer said. “It’s incompatible with the practice of clinical diagnosis, in which doctors make conclusions to ‘a reasonable degree of scientific certainty.’”

Constitutionality questions linger. The Supreme Court banned the execution of mentally handicapped people in 2002’s Atkins. v. Virginia.

In Atkins, the Supreme Court wrote, “Because of their disabilities in areas of reasoning, judgment, and control of their impulses …. [Mentally handicapped people] do not act with the level of moral culpability that characterizes the most serious adult criminal conduct.”

The United States Supreme Court can prevent Hill’s execution. As for ethical concerns underlying the case, Kammer alluded to universality. “Executing someone like Mr. Hill is morally corrosive and cheapens all our lives.”

 



About the Author

Imani Jackson
Imani Jackson
Imani Jackson is a journalist and FAMU College of Law student with social commentary and/or news stories published on HBCU Digest, Clutch Magazine, the Daily American newspaper in Somerset, Pa, and the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education.




 
 

 
municipal-broadband

The False Promise of Municipal Broadband

This op-ed on the dangers of government owned broadband networks, by Senator Catherine Pugh, president of the National Caucus of Black State Legislators, originally appeared in the Baltimore Sun.     For many local govern...
by Guest Contributor
1

 
 
2012-09-27t000937z_249793774_gm1e89r0mcz01_rtrmadp_3_puertorico

Death Penalty Strikes Out Again in Puerto Rico

On Saturday, a lone juror in a criminal case before the U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico was all that stood between the Alexis Candelario Santana and the death penalty. The Federal Prosecutors wanted to get a...
by jeanvidal
0

 
 
SCOTUS2

SCOTUS Hears Voting Rights Act Challenge, Will Likely Uphold Law

Yesterday, the US Supreme Court heard the state of Alabama’s challenge to section 5 of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby County v. Eric Holder case. Background Congress enacted the law to counterbalance states that had dis...
by Jeneba Ghatt
2

 

Advertisement
 
Barack Obama, John Boehner

Congress: Regional Splits Stymie Washington

By Charles Ellison for the Philadelphia Tribune There are endless reasons explaining the dysfunction of Congress these days. Theories abound, accusations fly across the airwaves, and the circular firing squads are hastily rearm...
by The Philadelphia Tribune
1

 
 
naacp866

Game Changers: NAACP Hosts Religious Leaders Summit in Atlanta

From the NAACP: The NAACP started a three-day National Religious Leaders Summit yesterday in Atlanta, Georgia, to help move the faith community back to its long-held leadership role in matters of social justice. “The religiou...
by Politic365 Staff
0

 




9 Comments


  1. [...] pending execution of Warren Lee Hill, Jr., currently scheduled for February 19 in Georgia, raises all these [...]


  2. [...] Georgia’s plan to execute man with developmental disabilitiesraises moral questions [...]


  3. I agree with Kammer it is morally incorrect, give him life.


  4. We should always err on the side of caution, particularly when it comes to the death penalty. Commute it to life sentence. This is exactly why drone strikes against US citizens should be illegal – how will a drone know if someone is mentally handicapped?


  5. Personally, I say let him go. Society is better off without him.


  6. GOD Bless him. No he should not be put to death. TO be honest, I don’t think he needs to be in prison. Perhaps a mental institution would be better for him. He does not understand what he has done….


  7. hmmm…torn on this one…what about the people he killed? hard call…


  8. I honestly think they should let him finish his sentancing there is no need to kill him.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>