11:20am January 15, 2013

Government Can Improve Gun Records and Background Checks


By Robert J. Spitzer

The word “possible” in the old political axiom that “politics is the art of the possible” hardly seems to apply to the gun debate. Despite calls for action after last month’s horrible school shooting in Connecticut, political cynics seem to have it right when they opine that not much, if anything, is likely to change. After all, haven’t we seen this movie before after similar shootings?

This time, though, the cynics might be wrong. Here’s why.

Notable changes in national gun policy have occurred infrequently, but when they have, they’ve come in the aftermath of shocking gun-related events that upended conventional politics. The first modern national gun-control law, the National Firearms Act of 1934, was the culmination of an orgy of gang violence that riveted the nation’s attention. (Bonnie and Clyde were gunned down two months before the bill’s passage; notorious gangster John Dillinger was killed a month after the law’s enactment.) The Gun Control Act of 1968 won final passage because of the escalation of urban violence and the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr., and Robert Kennedy. The spur to enact the 1994 assault weapons ban was founded in the killing of schoolchildren in California by a drifter using a Chinese-made assault rifle.

Admittedly, all of these actions occurred during times of unified party control. But consider another such moment: the aftermath of the 1999 Columbine shooting. Within weeks, Congress was enmeshed in consideration of a bill requiring background checks for all sales at gun show, a bar on unlicensed Internet gun sales and tougher gun crime penalties, among other provisions. Despite open hostility from the Republican leaders who controlled Congress, they yielded to public pressure — amplified by support from then-President Clinton — and brought bills to the floor of both houses. The measure passed in the Senate, but eventually lost in the House after tumultuous consideration. Republican leaders would have preferred to let the bills die quietly in committee, but yielded in the face of public outcry.

If the current divided Congress again yields to public demand for change, what measures might have some effect not only on generalized gun violence but on the kind of mass shootings that have outraged the nation? Aside from renewal of the assault weapons ban and limits on bullet magazines, other measures have received far less attention but might be more achievable and, arguably, have an even greater impact.

A 50-year study of mass shootings conducted and reported by The New York Times in 2000 found that a majority of the killers had clear histories of mental illness and gave ample warnings of the heinous crimes they were about to commit. A recent study by Mother Jones examined every mass shooting in the last 30 years and found that the killers got their guns legally about 80 percent of the time. These studies point to a gaping problem: Despite the fact that federal law bars gun sales to the mentally incompetent, and despite an effort by Congress in 2007 to improve record-keeping after the Virginia Tech shooting, the current national background check system is woefully inadequate. According to the Government Accountability Office, while the total number of mental health records submitted by states to the national system increased from 126,000 in 2004 to 1.2 million in 2011, most of that increase came from only a few states. Shockingly, 30 states provided no non-criminal records.

Changes in another record-keeping matter could also have a big effect. For years, gun-lobby pressure has quietly sought to strangle proper record-keeping and gun-data analysis, in the following ways:

• The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has been barred for years from computerizing its gun-tracing information.

• Beginning in 1996, the Centers for Disease Control was barred from funding gun research.

• Since 2003, a succession of amendments has required the destruction of background-check data required for gun purchases within 24 hours (it used to be 90 days), and has restricted data access by researchers and law enforcement.

• In 2010, a provision was quietly slipped into the Affordable Care Act to restrict the ability of doctors to gather data about patients’ gun use.


• In 2012, then-Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.) authored a measure to bar the National Institutes of Health from spending money to “advocate or promote gun control” — in other words, to research it.


Federal action could readily tighten all-too-easy gun access for the mentally unbalanced, just as it could reverse the tide of willful ignorance about guns that hobbles law enforcement and important research efforts. “Improve gun record-keeping” isn’t much of a political rallying cry, but it is a goal within ready legislative grasp.

Spitzer is Distinguished Service Professor and chairman of the Political Science Department at the State University of New York College at Cortland. He is the author of four books on gun policy, including The Politics of Gun Control.

Read more: http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/277099-government-can-improve-gun-records#ixzz2I0TVr558

About the Author

Guest Contributor
Guest Contributor
The ideas and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and have complete editorial independence from any Politic365 partners, sponsors, or advertisers. For additional information about Politic365, please visit http://politic365.com/about/.



Do Video Games Promote Racism? A Look at “World of Tanks”

This post originally appeared in Más Wired. By Elaine Rita Mendus Games are notorious for breeding racism. Not so much through in-game content, but through the charming player base. This is commonly looked down upon by compute...
by MásWired

women in combat

Women at War: End the Mocking of Fighting Women!

BY DUSIN MENDUS Last month the U.S. armed forces finally allowed combat duties for women. The decision is not without controversy, with some people fearing that women in combat will simply not be up to par with men in terms of ...
by Guest Contributor


Affordable Education in California Via Open Source Textbooks

By Dustin Mendus Rising costs of tuition and textbooks are not unknown to college students and there’s historically been little in terms of relief for these rising costs aside from used book sales and the (still expensive) e-...
by MásWired



Mitt Romney and the GOP: When Truth Hurts More Than Losing

By Daryl Gale of the Philadelphia Tribune OK, Republicans, we’ll go over this one last time: I am Black. I voted for President Barack Obama. I did not vote for him because he’s Black, and I’m willing to bet my meager pay...
by The Philadelphia Tribune


A $1000,000 Horse: Mitt Romney’s Tone-Deafness

The day before the opening ceremonies of the 2012 London Olympics, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney provided yet another reason why he is not as prepared for the presidency as the athletes are for the Olympics. Romn...
by Marvin King



Be the first to comment!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>