Politic365

 
 


National

1:15pm November 28, 2012

Stalling Obama’s Power: 83 Judicial Vacancies Awaiting Senate Action

vacant3

By Carl Tobias, University of Richmond Law School 

On this Thanksgiving holiday, the United States circuit and district courts have reason to be thankful that a number of the 83 lower court vacancies which have existed for more than three years may finally be filled. Those openings, which first reached 90 in August 2009, have hovered at or near that figure ever since. However, it remains unclear precisely how many of those empty seats the U.S. Senate and President Barack Obama will soon fill. This uncertainty persists, especially given the mixed record of cooperation on judicial appointments compiled throughout the first Obama Administration and the myriad difficulties, particularly the “fiscal cliff,” which the nation continues to experience. Nevertheless, Obama and the Senate must work together this Thanksgiving to fill the unoccupied posts.

Democrats and Republicans have cooperated somewhat in the area of judicial selection. The federal bench presently experiences 83 vacancies, while President Obama has nominated 49 candidates for those openings. The judiciary should be grateful that the chief executive has nominated, and the Senate has confirmed, two extraordinary Supreme Court Justices, 30 exceptional appellate judges, and 128 excellent district judges.

Obama has assiduously sought the guidance and support of Democrat and Republican elected officials before actual nominations and has tapped nominees of balanced temperament, who are intelligent, diligent, independent and ethical, as well as diverse vis-á-vis ethnicity, gender and ideology. Numerous observers criticized the administration for nominating too slowly in 2009, but the White House subsequently accelerated the pace. The courts ought to give thanks for Obama’s increased diligence when making nominations, as manifested by his nominating seven well qualified district court candidates last week.

The bench should thank Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking member, for expediting panel consideration and Senator Henry Reid (D-Nev.), the majority leader, for attempting to cooperate closely with Republicans on confirming nominees. A signal of collegiality is that Leahy may hold only one more nomination hearing this year.

The federal judiciary and the 19 strong lower court nominees, most of whom the committee approved with no substantive opposition and have waited months for votes, should also be grateful that the Senate finally returned to Washington last week for a lame duck session. Moreover, the bench should be heartened by President Obama’s call for greater bipartisanship in that session and the Republican leadership’s apparent willingness to work effectively with Democrats to solve the country’s problems. One critical difficulty which bipartisanship can solve is the plethora of judicial vacancies that jeopardize the delivery of justice.

Despite the cooperative efforts to fill the many openings recounted above, the Senate could have approved a considerably larger number of judges, had some Republican members cooperated more fully with Democrats. Throughout most of the 112th Congress, GOP senators have slowed floor votes by placing holds on nominees, while Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the minority leader, has cooperated less than he might by entering too few temporal agreements for nominee floor ballots. Indeed, after returning to Washington for three days, the Senate recessed last Thursday for the Thanksgiving holiday without considering any of the 19 well qualified nominees on the floor. Democrats and Republicans must cooperate more closely in confirming judges because the ten percent vacancy rate can erode courts’ efforts to swiftly, inexpensively and fairly resolve cases.

The federal judiciary, which has been operating without one in ten of its authorized active judgeships, apparently has much for which to be thankful this Thanksgiving. However, the promising signs will only materialize into judicial confirmations if Democrats and Republicans work cooperatively in the lame duck session and the 113th Senate for the good of the courts, Congress and the nation.

Tobias is the Williams Chair in Law at the University of Richmond.




About the Author

Guest Contributor
Guest Contributor





 
 

 
cornyn56

Republican Senator Drops “Civil Rights and Human Rights” from Committee Name

Just Another Moment in GOP Growth and Opportunity. Just in case anyone is wondering how the new Republican controlled Senate will deal with civil rights issues, wonder no more.  There’s a new Republican Chairman of the ...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 
 
SENATE

#Ferguson Bill Featuring Grand Jury Overhaul Debuts

H.R. 429. On January 21, Reps. Hank Johnson (D-GA) and Lacy Clay (D-MO), introduced the Grand Jury Reform Act.  The bill, which is related to the non indictments of police officers Darren Wilson and Dan Pantaleo, would requir...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
0

 
 
CBC8

The CBC in Ferguson

“Where do I start?  How about undefinable frustration? It seems we can’t even catch our breath from our first tragedy before being hit by another gut-punch from a second, third, and fourth.  The names Trayvon Martin, ...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
0

 

Advertisement
 
Jobs employment want ads unemployment Florida

10.4%: Black Unemployment Still Double But Lowest Since July 2008

Lower But Sill Double: Black Unemployment is 10.4%. Remember September 2011 when Black unemployment was 16.7%? In July 2008, the last year of President Bush’s presidency, Black unemployment was 10%. In December 2014, the...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 
 
john-conyers

House Dems Talk Of Limit to Seniority Power as CBC Hits Peak Seniority

The Power of Seniority. Some House Democrats are once again talking about limiting the power of seniority just as — you guessed it — boatloads of African American members of Congress are hitting their maximum power...
by Lauren Victoria Burke
1

 




0 Comments


Be the first to comment!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>