12:42pm October 19, 2012

Are Pundits the Problem?


In a lecture last week, I explained to 200 college freshman about opinion leaders and the two-step flow of information. This is the process by which well-informed opinion leaders shape the political views of less informed Americans. These opinion leaders can be found all over the place. In fact, the Internet has made it that much easier for wannabe political elites to bullhorn their views to the public.

A few opinion leaders like Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews have audiences in the millions. My reading of the political science literature is that these pundits do not necessarily change election outcomes because they primarily preach to their respective choirs. Conservatives listen to Hannity and O’Reilly and liberals watch Maddow and Matthews to confirm what they already believe.

That part of political punditry does not bother me. What is more problematic is how these pundits often focus on the superficial horse-race aspects of politics.

By that, I mean, despite the 24/7 news cycle, it still remains difficult to find substantive policy discussions on major policy issues. A Room for Debate feature in the New York Times picks up on this question, asking what the election would look like without the incessant reporting about polls. A few likely scenarios would play out.

First, turnout would be higher. Without indications one way or the other that one candidate was in the clear lead, voters might be less inclined to stay home on Election Day. Many Americans, convinced the outcome is a foregone conclusion, abstain from the vote.

Second, in a world without polls, pundits could not spend every minute talking about who is leading the race that day, and instead, would (hopefully – the non-lazy ones, at least) spend more time discussing actual policy implications of a vote for one candidate or the other.

Third, if voters relied less on polling, and pundits spent more time talking policy, Americans would be less susceptible to histrionic blabbering about socialism, communism, death panels, and all the other wasted-breath, Ann Coulter-style ad-hominem attacks characterizing what we call “debate.”

After the first presidential debate, the punditocracy tarried Obama for his passiveness, yet, few focused on the fact that many agreed with Obama’s answers. Instead, pundits focused on style, not substance. As a result, all Americans lost.

About the Author

Marvin King
Marvin King
Marvin King received his Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of North Texas and his B.A. from the University of Texas. Now, he is an Associate Professor of Political Science with a joint appointment in the African American Studies Program at the University of Mississippi. He conducts research into how political institutions affect African American politics. Marvin is available for public speaking engagements and you can follow him on Twitter @kingpolitics



Black History Month Is Time to Get Serious about Black Kids’ Futures

By Jamal Simmons Jamal Simmons is co-chair of the Internet Innovation Alliance. His political commentary has been seen on several television networks. For most of American history Black youth had ready-made jobs on farms or in ...
by Guest Contributor


Spectrum Efficiency Favors Private Enterprise

Concern about spectrum efficiency dates back more than twenty years when, in 1991, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) issued a report recommending steps to improve the ways spectrum is used an...
by Kristal High


Broadband Everything Panel Highlights Internet Impact on Seniors, STEM & Economic Opportunities

photo credit: Level Playing Field Institute The Rainbow PUSH Coalition held its annual Public Policy, Media & Telecom Symposium. This year’s event titled, “The Future of Media: Policies, People and Players” included p...
by DeVan Hankerson



Immigration and Its Deep Roots in Social Justice

Comprehensive immigration reform has been a hotly contested issue in recent times across many states and on the national stage.  But restrictive immigration policies will cause unintended economic consequences, adversely affec...
by Wendy Rivera


How Did Media Policy and Gun Policy Merge?

POLITICO’s Mike Allen (@MikeAllen) reports Vice President Biden will meet with former Sen. Chris Dodd of the Motion Picture Association of America; National Cable Television Association CEO and former FCC Chairman Micha...
by Joseph Miller



Be the first to comment!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>