Politic365

 
 


Headline

11:40am October 15, 2012

Puerto Rico Votes on Status: A Primer on Sovereign Commonwealth

island2

As the second installment of my discussion on the three non-territorial options available for Puerto Rican voters on Election Day, we turn to what some deem the “independence-light” option called “Sovereign Commonwealth” (Estado Libre Asociado Soberano) or “Sovereign Free Associated State.” As we have mentioned before, Puerto Rico will hold a plebiscite on its political status with the United States that will pose two questions to the electorate. The first question is whether or not voters want to continue the current territorial relationship. The second question is which of the three non-territorial options does the voter want: Independence, Statehood or Sovereign Commonwealth. Regarding Sovereign Commonwealth, or Sovereign Free Associated state, the official definition of this option, as printed on the ballot, will read:

Sovereign Free Associated State
Puerto Rico should adopt a status outside of the Territory Clause of the Constitution of the United States that recognizes the sovereignty of the People of Puerto Rico. The Sovereign Free Associated State would be based on a free and voluntary political association, the specific terms of which shall be agreed upon between the United States and Puerto Rico as sovereign nations. Such agreement would provide the scope of the jurisdictional powers that the People of Puerto Rico agree to confer to the United States and retain all other jurisdictional powers and authorities. If you agree, mark here:

While the notion of a associated republic like the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of Palau and the Marshall Islands has existed in Puerto Rico for decades, it was not until former governor Anibal Acevedo Vila championed it in his 2008 re-election campaign, including it in the Popular Democratic Party’s platform (PPD for its Spanish acronym), that the idea entered the political mainstream. While the PPD reversed its support for this option in 2012, instead calling on its supporters to reject the referendum by voting to keep the current territorial relationship (ie. a YES vote), a group call ALAS has taken to the task of promoting this option for the plebiscite.

Under this option, the U.S. and Puerto Rico would enter into a voluntary bilateral agreement, in which they (as sovereign nations) would decide which areas should be delegated to the U.S., and which will be handled solely by Puerto Rico. For example, it could adopt an agreement similar to the Federated States of Micronesia and allow for Puerto Rican citizens to serve on the U.S. Army without requiring citizenship or residency in the U.S. Puerto Rico could “buy in” into federal services such as the U.S. Postal Service and other telecommunications services already working in Puerto Rico.  However, either government would be free to end the agreement at any time they see fit. Additionally, Puerto Rico would certainly not be entitled to the nearly 4-1 ratio of federal funds to state funds currently spent in the Island.

Opposers of this option claim it is a veiled independence, aiming to break the century-old bond Puerto Rico has with the U.S., and threatening to eliminate the benefits earned by Puerto Ricans through federal programs. They (opposers) argue that this option tricks voters into thinking that they are merely voting for an enhanced commonwealth that increases local autonomy while maintaining the current relationship with the U.S. (in other words, federal funding and citizenship). The PPD has officially disavowed this option, much to the dismay of the “pro-sovereignty” (soberanistas) members of the party such as Carmen Yulin and Charlie Hernandez (the latter who received a sanction from his party by refusing to keep his opinions to himself, and publicly backing a NO vote and a vote for this option).

This option, like independence, places Puerto Rico on the side of free nations, with the benefits and risks that may entail. Stay tuned for the next entry, where I will discuss the option of the 51st state.



About the Author

jeanvidal





 
 

 
Georgians Go To The Polls During Early Voting Before General Election

Election 2014: Georgia 1+2+3 = Modern Voting Rights Movement #GA123

Last week I participated in #GA123 — one of the most cutting edge civic engagement events this election cycle. This “cross-platform” social media conference attracted over a hundred political leaders from the southeas...
by Kirk Clay
2

 
 
4625200243_63f628e4b8_o

DHS considering two changes to scale back deportations

On Thursday, the White House sent out an announcement after meeting with members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus indicating that President Obama had asked the Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson to review current pr...
by Adriana Maestas
3

 
 
628x471

As Most Avid Smartphone Users, Latinos Want Lower Wireless Taxes

A recent study by Nielsen says that Latinos are adopting and using smartphones at rates higher than any other ethnic or racial group.  As revealed in the latest Digital Consumer Report, even as Americans generally shift toward...
by Kristal High
0

 

Advertisement
 
131223_tom_wheeler_fcc_commissioners_ap_328

Designated Entity Rules and Secondary Market Transactions Should Be a Top-line Priority for the FCC

America’s tech and telecom sectors account for one-sixth of the nation’s GDP, and in an increasingly digital economy, spectrum is a vital resource for economic growth and entrepreneurial opportunity. This is particu...
by Kristal High
0

 
 
flags4

Election 2014: Governor Christie, McDonnell, and Scott – What Do They All Have In Common?

Three Things You May Not Know About Voters of Color in New Jersey, Virginia, and Florida. What does Governors Chris Christie, Bob McDonnell, and Rick Scott all have in common? They’re all from states rocked by scandal? No. Th...
by Kirk Clay
3

 




12 Comments


  1. [...] ballot, voters were asked to choose between statehood (becoming the 51st state), independence or sovereign free association. With 802, 179 votes in favor of becoming the 51st state, statehood imposed itself with 62% of the [...]


  2. As you have previously admitted, being “independentista”, meaning favoring independence for Puerto Rico, I’m lookind forward to your next entry where you will discuss the option of the 51st state.


  3. The most contentious one, I left for last :)


  4. Anoher commonwealth: the British Commonwealth of Nations, 54 nations.


  5. Sovereign Commonwealth is nothing but a gobbledygook fantasy instigated by pro-statehood and pro-independentist people to kill the true commonwealth option that stands for autonomy. A so called “sovereign commonwealth” is nothing but a sovereign republic that chooses to associate with another. For example: the United Kingdom, a sovereign country who chooses to ally and associate with the United States. A true autonomy is a nation of peoples that is associated with another to whom they delegate political sovereignty and keep some controls internally in their affairs, for example: Scotland or Cataluña. Now, some people will tell me, “hey, Scotland and Cataluña hate their lack of sovereignty and now want their independence!” Yes, that’s true. But at least they got to develop their autonomy with the UK and Spain, respectively, to the fullest extent possible. Unfortunately, that has never happened in Puerto Rico; those sore losers who have never won a referendum for statehood or independence have historically blocked every effort to develop the autonomous condition of Puerto Rico, and now pretend to kill it with the gobbledygook of a Sovereign Commonwealth fantasy. I contend that, since the pro-statehood party does not have the guts to hold a referendum to decide “Statehood Yes or NO” and instead they are excluding the Commonwealth party that always beats them in the ballot, statehood may for the first time win a referenduma, albeit a fictitious one. I contend that if that happens, that mandate is disrespected by all believers in the Commonwealth. If democracy is not good enough for those who have won the referendums of 1967, 1993 and 1998, it shall not be good enough for those who mold a victory.


    • The existing Estado Libre Asociado might be considered gobbledygook. A colony by any other name would stink as much. There is only one improvement to a colonial status: grow out of it. Obviously, I prefer full freedom for my country and being able to negotiate treaties with the USA and other countries as an equal. But, for the sake of argument, the status of being part of a commonwealth in its true sense (mancomunidad de naciones) might be an improvement.


    • I used gobbledygook first, so please try to be a little more original when fighting back from your 2% soap box. A commonwealth system like those enjoyed by the nations of the United Kingdom was actually the vision in 1952–there was not other example to mimic. But your independentis cronies have helped the pro-statehood losers for hte past 44 years to prevent that from happening, and that is why today we have a system that, while it is not officially a colony, it reaks just like one. We have to thank the people you support for that. Remember: la calentura no está en la sábana (the problem is not the Commonwealth system, but the sabotaging of the system by those who refuse to accept the fact that they have lost all three referendums.


    • José, disculpa, pensé que eras una persona coherente con quien debatir ideas. Esta es mi última participación en este tema, no tengo tiempo ni interés en corregir todas tus equivocaciones.


    • Eso es lo que siempre me dicen los que tratan de debatirme desde el púlpito del 2%. Váyase por favor a convencer a los suyos primero.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>