Politic365

 
 


Headline

8:57pm June 11, 2012

Jerry Brown’s Home Care Challenge

images

As covered last month on Politic365, Governor Jerry Brown’s budget is poised to make some devestating cuts. Facing a nearly $16 billion deficit, California Governor Brown’s budget proposal will cut at home care workers’ hours by seven percent. Cuts to home care workers will not only affect those being treated, but there could be far reaching consequences for families of sick and disabled folks – and for California tax payers.

For the past week, home care workers, the sick, and the elderly have been in Sacramento ramping up pressure on legislators to fix the state’s home care system to prevent budget cuts from taking effect.  The ultimate goal is to pass an alternative to what the Governor is proposing. Their campaign is called “Healthy at Home,” which promotes a bill introduced by State Senator Steinberg and Assembly Speaker Perez to secure the future of home health care and make the delivery of care more consumer oriented.

Steinberg’s bill, SB 1503, would require the creation of a stakeholder group to design a plan for the integration of long-term health services, would provide a plan to make home services the first option for long-term care, coordinate a plan to maximize cost effectiveness and maintain a consumer’s right to hire, fire and supervise his or her home care provider. Numerous studies have established that home care is more cost effective than institutional care in a hospital or nursing home.

The folks with Let’s Get Health at Home say that it costs the state about $4,000 per month to place an elderly or disabled person in a facility, while In Home Supportive Services pays home care providers between $9-$11 an hour to provide care at home. Home health care costs a bit less than half of what insitutional care would cost. More than 400,000 low income seniors and disabled Californians benefit from this program. Without it, there would likely be more hospitalizations, which ultimately are paid for by the taxpayer.

Additionally, funding for home care in the states is augmented by funding from the federal government. In California, for every $2 the state spends on home care, it receives $4 in federal funding. If Jerry Brown’s budget succeeds, a chunk of federal funding could disappear.

In minority communities, there are already disparities in care and health outcomes. Cutting home care, which is a key component in maintaining health and preventing hospitalization, could be an added burden for already strapped Black and Latino families in California. Last week protesters delivered 75,000 petitions to the Governor’s office urging him to reconsider the cuts. The legislative budget deadline is on Friday, June 15th, so the Governor and legislators will need to come up with a deal soon.

Governor Brown’s approval rating is dipping. 43 percent of California voters disapprove of the job he’s doing, while 42 percent approve. Yet a majority of voters remain supportive of his plan to raise taxes in November. Governor Brown will have to remain popular enough to successfully promote his tax plan or get used to being the bearer of bad news.



About the Author

Adriana Maestas
Adriana Maestas is the senior contributing editor of Politic365.com. She has covered issues ranging from immigration and higher education to health care policy. Adriana holds a bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of California, Irvine and a master’s degree in public policy from Claremont Graduate University. You can find her on twitter: @LatinoPolitics




 
 

 
May Day 2013 2246

As Senate Passes Immigration Amendments, House Reaches Deal

On Thursday, a bipartisan group in the House of Representatives came to an “agreement in principle” on proceeding forward with immigration reform. The House is expected to work on drafting a bill that will be introd...
by Adriana Maestas
0

 
 
yo vote 2

Lowered Voting Age in Illinois Likely to Help Latino Electorate

Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is expected to sign a bill that would allow some 17 year olds to vote in elections. There’s a qualifier though — only those who will be 18 by the general election will be allowed to vote....
by Adriana Maestas
0

 
 
minoritycollege

Post-High School Decision Could Cost You $550,000

With an economy in recovery and a job market harder to enter than Fort Knox, many are questioning the true value of college these days. For African-Americans and Hispanic Americans this question is particularly important. Both ...
by Jessica Washington
0

 

Advertisement
 
pedro7

Pedro Pierluisi to Push for a Yes/No Statehood Vote for Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico’s Resident Commissioner (ie. our non-voting congressman) Pedro Pierluisi proposed a bill in Congress to grant Puerto Rico the type of vote the Senate rarely gives itself: a straight Yes/No vote on Statehood. R...
by jeanvidal
0

 
 
frankrich130513_feature_560

Whitewash

When you start talking about race and the Republican Party, Republicans tend to say the following things. First, they tell you that most Republicans are not bigots (true) and that Democrats can be bigots, too (also true).
by Guest Contributor
0

 




One Comment


  1. Earl Richards

    Brown is blackmailing Californians. Why does Brown always pick-on the most vulnerable, education and the public services? Brown should close commercial and corporate tax loopholes, introduce an oil extraction tax, an oil corporation, windfall-profits tax, Chevron of San Ramon made $27 billions in 2011 and paid no federal tax, and trim the service-debt paid Wall Street. Why should students and the poor be blamed for the budget deficit? These taxes have to be rolled-back. These budget cuts will prolong the recession.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>