2:18pm April 16, 2012

Ann Romney’s Mommy War and Race



What a difference a day makes in the much hyped Mommy Wars.

From Wednesday to Thursday of last week, Hilary Rosen, a Democratic pundit, went from stating that Ann Romney’s status as a wealthy woman without a professional career nullified her ability to advise Mitt Romney on women’s viewpoints regarding economic issues, to being completely thrown under the bus despite her clarifying comments and public apology.

From Thursday to Friday, Ann Romney went from pivoting away from Hilary Rosen’s comments in an attempt to refocus media attention on anemic macroeconomic indicators, to embracing the circus of the “Mommy Wars,” as well as deliberately using the coded language right-wing strategists have used in an attempt to distance women from “special interest” entities like Planned Parenthood, organized labor, and social/racial/economic justice advocacy groups.

By Saturday, an email blast from Romney campaign Senior Advisor, Beth Meyers, went out, labeling Hilary Rosen an “Obama adviser,” and promoting the online sale of “Moms drive the economy” bumper stickers.

As Zerlina Maxwell wrote on Feministing: “Moms who are praised tend to be white and suburban… I would be hard pressed to find anyone, particularly on the right praising a woman of color for being a ‘stay at home’ mom.  I hear a lot of ‘welfare queen’ language or that our current president is a ‘food stamp’ president but nothing about how wonderful it is that so many women of color are choosing to stay at home and raise their kids.  More likely women of color who are ‘stay at home’ moms would be viewed as ‘lazy’ or ‘poor role models’ for their children.”

When a caller on Rush Limbaugh’s show asked, “If the Democrats can criticize Mrs. Romney for not working outside the home, then why don’t the Democrats criticize women on welfare for not working outside the home?,” Jack Kemp took this incendiary question and converted it into a full length piece for the American Thinker, “If you are a woman not on welfare—and especially if you are wealthy today—your past and current efforts and (at times) struggles to raise a family at home is illegit [sic]… That is, unless you have a seemingly no-show job at the U. of Chicago Hospital and your name is Michelle Obama.”

Mitt Romney and his supporters, after repeatedly accusing President Obama of (socioeconomic) “class warfare,” are ignoring Hilary Rosen’s apology, and focusing on the controversy generated by her original statement in an attempt to create a wedge between women, based not only on pocketbook considerations, but also on the basis of racially charged stereotypes.  This strategy is a win-win for Republicans seeking victory in November, especially in a national climate of heightened sensitivity with respect to racial biases.  One possible outcome is a reduction in the “gender gap,” a.k.a. the polling advantage that President Obama enjoys with female voters.  Another is the dissuasion of women’s participation in the electorate, as occurred when Republicans made historic gains in 1994.

On Friday, a woman who identified herself as “Juanita,” a former Romney family cook and babysitter, called Stephanie Miller’s show claiming Ann Romney truly “never worked.”  This not only added fuel to the fire of this already heated exchange, but also reminded those paying attention of past Romney family controversies:  including the decisions to pay their four maids barely half of the lowest range in average housekeeper salaries, and twice hire low-wage undocumented workers to perform landscaping services.

While these are real issues, they are not at the heart of what generated this controversy in the first place.

In the late 1950s, the poverty rate for all Americans was 22.4%.  By 1973, it was 11.1%. The poverty rate rose again, reaching 15.1% by 1993. It declined to 11.3% by 2000, but rose to 15.1% by 2010.  Yet these numbers do not paint a complete picture of poverty in America.   40% of female-headed households live in poverty. Women are poorer than men regardless of racial/ethnic group, and Latinas and African American women are the poorest of all.

If we reasonably assume that men and women are both equally capable of being parents, and have an equal responsibility for both unpaid work as homemakers and caregivers, as well as economic support, then our public policies must facilitate equally shared parenting, without penalty to employment, advancement, benefits, and so forth.  Single women currently incur all of the consequences when their sexual behavior results in pregnancy.  Single men do not.  It’s time to establish paternity and legally require fathers to contribute their time and money toward the clothing, feeding, housing, care, education, and development of their children.  When fathers are unable to pay, or when their contributions fail to raise the household out of poverty, the government must step in with effective programs providing everything from financial support to high quality public education—from Early Childhood Education in daycares/preschools that promote school readiness, to K-12 systems that eradicate achievement gaps and afford all students a college and career path, to systems of higher education that do not trap students in years of schooling and decades of debt repayment without degree or job prospect guarantees.

Because the politics of gender collide so completely with the realities of race, the role of education must ultimately embrace a curriculum that comprehensively addresses current—not just the historic—inequalities, ambiguities, and uncertainties that lead to the overpopulation of women and people of color in poverty.

About the Author

Unai Montes-Irueste
Unai Montes-Irueste
Unai Montes-Irueste has worked as a management consultant, nonprofit executive, community organizer, and classroom teacher, seeking to elevate the capacity of individuals, organizations, and communities to make change. As a social-political-racial-economic justice champion, he advocates on behalf of high quality, Pre-K through college, publicly funded, equitable education for all.



Effective Civic Engagement Requires Balanced Viable Plan and Intentionality

Evidence based civic engagement is a fairly nascent field. In fact, up until 20 years ago, what people now think of as civic engagement for “people of color” was characterized naively as just minority outreach. Therefore, i...
by Kirk Clay


Increasing African-American Inclusion in Tech

By Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II (D-Mo.) This article originally appeared on The Hill, and was republished with permission from Congressman Cleaver’s staff.  On July 26, 1948, Missouri’s first and only president, Harry S. T...
by Guest Contributor

Screen Shot 2016-01-07 at 10.44.25 PM

Hispanic Caucus & its members criticize ICE raids

On Wednesday, the Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Rep. Linda Sanchez, finally released a statement about the ICE raids that have been happening across the country. Rep. Sanchez said: “Invading homes is inhuman...
by Adriana Maestas



MISO Appoints Two African Americans to Its Board of Directors

The nation’s first regional transmission organization, MISO (Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.) made history on December 10, 2015 by appointing two African Americans to its board of directors.  Phyllis Curr...
by Politic365 Staff


Texas State University Home to Inaugural Party Politics #ChalkboardCampus Tour

Party Politics launched its inaugural Chalkboard Campus tour at Texas State University with the Organization of Student Social Workers (OSSW), Monday, October 26th at 10am outside the Alkek Library. The #ChalkboardCampus Tour i...
by Politic365 Staff



  1. [...] tax cuts, but in a private event Sunday, …Romney clarifies upcoming policy plansmsnbc.comSee, if Ann Romney was Black …Politic365Romney Specifies Deductions He'd CutWall Street JournalUSA TODAY -KCRA [...]

  2. [...] clarifies upcoming policy plansmsnbc.comRomney Specifies Deductions He'd CutWall Street JournalPolitic365 -CBS Local -WMUR Manchesterall 199 news articles » This entry was posted [...]

  3. Great blog right here! Additionally your website loads up very fast! What web host are you using? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink on your host? I wish my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  4. [...] discouraged in the job world by getting less and less pay. Which reminds me, did you hear about Ann Romney? Kaycorbs444: Yes! You know I agree that being a mom is definitely the hardest job in the world, [...]

  5. [...] I offer these examples and statistics to prove that while any individual—in this case, a single mom—certainly is an agent who can choose to empower herself, and choose to improve her circumstances, and her child’s circumstances, yet as a matter of incontrovertible fact, there are always going to be things outside of her control. As a case in point, she has almost zero influence over the fact that as a single mom, she is many times more likely to belong to the 47% of Americans who do not pay income taxes, written off by Mitt Romney, because his wealth, racial identity, and gender privilege lead him to presume she does not comprehend the “dignity of work.” She did not choose to create a society in which both men and women are both equally capable of being parents, but do not have an equal responsibility for both unpaid work as homemakers and caregivers, much less economic support. She did not write public policies that presently do not facilitate equally shared parenting, without penalty to employment, advancement, benefits, and so forth. Single women currently incur all of the consequences when their sexual behavior results in pregnancy. Single men do not. Until such a time that a universal mechanism exists for establishing paternity and legally requiring fathers to contribute their time and money toward the clothing, feeding, housing, care, education, and development of their children, all of these charges will legally remain, almost exclusively, the terrain of moms. By seeking to improve not only her well-being, not only the well-being of her child, but also the well-being of others, a single mom can help transform the US into the nation it should be. Yet she did not make the country as it is. She did not choose the current—much less the historic—inequalities, ambiguities, and uncertainti…. [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>