Adriana Maestas
+ FollowCPAC: Grammys of Hate Speech
Providing a platform to one of the nation’s noted White supremacists is not a good way to say “Bienvenidos” to Hispanics who may be interested in conservative candidates and causes. But, that’s exactly what CPAC did a few days ago when it allowed Peter Brimelow to speak at a panel called, “The Failure of Multiculturalism: How the pursuit of diversity is weakening the American Identity.”
Brimelow is the editor and founder of VDARE.com, a noted anti-immigration website that has been profiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center because of its hateful messaging. VDARE.com is named for Virginia Dare, who is noted as the first child born in the Americas to English parents.
CBS news reported:
“In an interview with Hotsheet, Brimelow, an immigrant from Great Britain, said he’s opposed to not only illegal immigration, but legal immigration too. He said it is creating a Spanish speaking underclass parallel to the African American underclass.”
“These are people who are completely dysfunctional. They’re on welfare; they’re not doing any kind of work – at least not legal work – and their children are having a terrible time. They’re dropping out of school; there’s an increase in teenage pregnancy,” Brimelow said.
Brimelow told Hotsheet California is “rapidly turning into Hispanic slum.” He said California used to be “paradise” but is now “totally overrun by barrios of illegal immigrants.””
The irony is that Brimelow is an immigrant himself and indicated that he’s even opposed to legal immigration. It looks like he hasn’t considered self-deporting. But, the big problem for CPAC is that he’s a noted racist, and his anti-diversity message was legitimized during a panel that was sponsored by ProEnglish, an organization advocating for English as the official language.
Al Cardenas, the Chairman of The American Conservative Union, the group who puts on the CPAC conference, is looking into the Brimelow brouhaha. In damage control mode, Cardenas has already told the media that he doesn’t really know what Brimelow’s values are. But on its face, a panel that is titled, “The Failure of Multiculturalism” sponsored by a group called ProEnglish should have raised a red flag for the conference planners to do a bit of research on the panelists.
Cardenas had recently penned a piece for Fox News Latino, stating, “Our job at CPAC is to broaden our message to all Americans – including Hispanics.” Allowing Brimelow and his counterparts to talk about how Latino immigrants are completely dysfunctional does not convey “mi casa es su casa” very well to this growing population. Either you want Hispanic support or not.
More on Politic365
20 Responses to CPAC: Grammys of Hate Speech
-
stormkite says:
Fairly typical Republicult/Conservative behavior. Preach to the choirs, whip up the rabid dogs, and then IF they’re caught, claim ignorance and fake an apology.
They’re NOT ignorant, and they’re NOT sorry except that they were caught. And they’ve CERTAINLY got no interest in the Latino citizenry except as scapegoats and whipping boys. (Any stray votes from people who buy talking points will be accepted, of course, but there are far more votes to be gained running against brown people than by trying to fool them…)
-
Annie Jo says:
LOL!!! Talking about white supremacists, while we have LA RAZA, MECHA, LULAC, the HISPANIC CAUCUS, MALDEF, the BROWN BERETS, all these RACIST HISPANIC ONLY GROUPS, representing ONLY HISPANICS. Then, we have the BLACK CAUCUS, NAACP and the BLACK PANTHERS, who violated the voting rights of white citizens, on November 2008, election day. At a Pennsylvania voting place, 2 BLACK PANTHERS stood outside, dressed in military garb, one brandishing a night stick calling white citizens "cracker" and other Anti-White Racist slurs, while threatening them to dare vote, while holding the night stick. Racist Eric Holder and Racist Thomas Perez dropped all charges, sending a clear message to all blacks and whites, we are not equal. Whites are not protected under the HATE CRIME STATUTES. Non-whites are allowed to commit HATE CRIMES, against whites, called them Racist slurs and violate their Civil Voting rights. Since, then Racist brutal beatings, assaults, rapes and murders, against whites, by non-whites have tripled. The liberal media hides them, like the 4 to 5 hour torture of white boy Shane McClellan in Seattle, by 2 non-whites, the brutal beatings of lone white people all across the country, last spring and summer, Carter Strange Walking While White was brutally beaten, by 8 Racist black thugs, where he had to have immediate brain surgery and most recently the brutal Racist murder of Kevin Kless in Philadelphia, by 3 non-whites, who one was bragging at work, about beating a "white boy" to death. These are just a very few of the many, many, many brutal assaults, where NO HATE CRIME CHARGES are ever filed.
The biggest FEDERAL HATE CRIME, being committed against all Americans, is the ILLEGAL HISPANIC ALIEN INVASION. Where Millions of ILLEGAL HISPANIC ALIENS, are allowed to break several laws, not be punished and then, demand SPECIAL PREFERRED TREATMENT, above all. They demand, not to be punished, but to be given exactly what they broke our laws to get, U.S. citizenship. NEVER AGAIN!!!
White people DO, have the same equal right to stand up and to unite together based on color of skin. Non-whites can do it, we can. It is a new era. Not only has multiculturalism failed, but Civil Rights failed. You can't demand Equal Rights, then discriminate against whites and say, they can't represent their skin color, when non-whites do it, so blatantly and proudly.
-
illegal squatter says:
Concealed behind the benevolent facade of the American mission civilisatrice is the brutal reality of invasion, slavery, forced relocation, genocide, land theft, ethnocide, and forcible denial of the right to self-determination wholly incompatible with contemporary understandings of U.S.-Indian history and with the notions of justice informing the human rights regime. It is perhaps impossible to overstate the magnitude of the human injustice perpetrated against Indian people in denial of their right to exist, on their aboriginal landbase, as self-determining peoples: indeed, the severity and duration of the harms endured by the original inhabitants of the United States may well exceed those suffered by all other groups domestic and international.
-
john says:
well youve seen it here via lve America
-
-
On May 3rd, 1493, Pope Clement called upon Spanish conquistadores to discover and conquer new lands in the Americas in order to draw "barbarous nations" to the Christian faith. The subsequent invasion of the Western Hemisphere, predicated upon a jurisprudential assumption that the indigenous inhabitants were a distinctly inferior species, was governed by the legal principles of discovery and conquest. The latter provided as a matter of international law that a nation became the sovereign of territory its agents "discovered" provided it subjugated the population and annexed its lands. Although prudence restrained pre-eighteenth century aggression in lands that became the United States, conquest was eventually applied in all the Americas, and the period subsequent to first contact is notorious as the "Age of Genocide."
-
I assume you failed freshman logic, if you ever took it.
-
It dont get much clearer Hell they can even place there acts Via Satelite/radio. and its tolerated Im like really 1 st cor: 4 9-14
-
-
joeh says:
Well done!!
-
You have got to be kidding! Yours is a ridiculous post at best. One or two examples of "non-whites hurting a white person does not equate to 100+ years of slavery, unequal treament, lynchings, shootings, etc…There are many "white only" clubs that still exist today that far eclipse the number Black and Hispanic Caucus'. Your post drips with hate and prejudice toward African Americans and Hispanics. It is a new era…time for you to step out of slavery times and move forward. We are all God's people….get a grip!
-
Nobody is flooding and forcibly “integrating” every black nations and ONLY black nation with non-blacks and calling native blacks evil racists for opposing their replacement. This is happening in white nations and ONLY in white nations. Its genocide. They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
-
Pingback: Bob's Site Down?
-
Kid Caboos says:
Africa isn't becoming non-black. African people don't have a policy of mass non-black immigration and assimilation forced upon them.
Asia isn't becoming non-Asian. Asian people don't have a policy of mass non-Asian immigration and assimilation forced upon them.
Yet EVERY white country has to accept a policy of mass non-white immigration and assimilation that no one ever voted for.
The anti-whites want a mixed, blended humanity for EVERY white country ONLY White countries.
They want white genocide.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
-
dwes says:
This country is not a white country, never has been never will be. the indigenous people are "red" (to use a rather silly term). Africa and Asia have been primarily one racial stock for hundreds of thousands of years. By comparison North America was over run by white folks 400 years ago, and it took them quite a while to murder most of the native peoples and declare the continent "white".
Some how you have conveniently forgotten that, or perhaps took too many drugas in school to learn it!
-
-
Around 1960, White countries opened their borders and let millions of non-Whites in.
Then, the government and media told us all to “assimilate” or “mix together”.
And slandered ALL White people, who did not want this forced integration and assimilation of our communities and families, as "Racists".
And now, Whites are expected to be minorities in most White countries by 2040 as predicted by the United Nations.
If this was done to ONLY Asian countries, would you still need proof that some people are trying to permanently get rid of Asian people by blending them out of existence, AKA genocide? Would you need the newspapers or some commentator to tell you this?
Can you see why “Anti-racism” is a codeword for anti-White?
-
You are quite welcome to your opinions, but you are not welcome to make up your own facts. If you were to crack open an actual history book, you would not sound like an inbred genetic mutant with a white sheet over his head..
Also perhaps take a look at some modern genetics research to get a sense of what a primitive notion race is! There is nothing "racially pure" about you or anyone else on this earth, and never has been. the ONLY people who come remotely close to making that statement are the San (Bushman) people of Southern Africa. They are the most "racially pure" human population.
-
-
White People can never disprove we are “racist”, our very existence is seen as a form of “racism” by the so-called “anti-racists”.
They say all things White must become “diverse” or it is “racism”.
They say there should be no White countries, no White communities, no White schools, no White sports, no White social gatherings, etc, etc.
The anti-Whites give us Whites two choices: Accept White geNOcide or you are a “racist”.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. -
White people don't have to prove any such thing. it is only the backwards minority of white folks like you. Give one actual example of "white genocide". Can you?
Give one actual example of the silly crap you claim is going on that has to do with white people being marginalized or discriminated against, as opposed to hate groups being opposed. For example anti-clan activity is not genocide or hatred for whites, it is sane and normal people opposing the anti-american actions of a tiny minority of idiots. -
Julian Bridges says:
Are we all as Americans not willing to face reality? Worldwide there is a gradual blending of the three recognized races–Negroid, Mongoloid, and Caucasian. Modern methods of communication and migration are now hastening this trend that has been going on for centuries. There are no "pure" races. Of what "race" are those from South Asia, such as India? In many parts of this diverse nation skin pigmentation may be quite dark, but hair is smooth and facial features resemble that of Europeans. And the aborigines of largely central Australia? The famous female tennis star, Goolagong (sp.?), had some Negroid features of the aborigines, but her complexion was quite light. The vast majority of African Americans have Caucasian blood. These are only a few examples.
Now for a little history concerning Hispanics in the U. S. Prior to the Great Depression, many of those who were illegal were welcome to do jobs very few Americans wanted. However, when the Depression hit, many Hispanics were herded into cattle cars throughout the country and shipped back to Mexico. During World War II, illegals from Mexico were welcome again, and were given a new legal title of "bracero." This continued until 1964, when Congress decided that they should not be welcome anymore. The demand for less than minimum wage labor continued, however (as it does today), and there were MANY employers that willingly gave jobs to undocumented laborers to meet this demand. As long as the "demand" is there, somehow the "supply" will be met. The same families in Mexico, for example, who sent documented laborers during the bracero years are simply sending their grandchildren and great-grandchildren today. The only difference is they are now technically "illegal."
Do Americans REALLY want to pay MUCH more for their produce, roof-repairers, child care, motel rooms , etc., etc.? If they cannot find fellow Americans who are willing to work for what is now paid for such types of labor, they will HAVE to create a LEGAL labor supply of such persons AND pay them more than minimum wages OR raise those wages high enough that current Americans will take those undesirable jobs.
As for fences, if tunneling is not convenient, ladders can always be built taller. Again, do we REALLY want in times of GREAT deficits to pay for guards and patrols every 100 yards of fencing, along the almost 2,000-mile border? If so, we are talking about TRILLIONS of our tax payers' dollars!!!
One major solution would be for us to allow and even encourage employers to CONTRACT LEGALLY with the Mexican government, as we do with persons from other nations who have skilled (HIGH-TECH) workers that are needed in this country. We often offer a path to citizenship for these workers, after years of legal residency and then meeting the requirements for all other immigrants. After all, did we not ALL migrate here at one time in the past? I WELCOME YOUR RESPONSE TO THESE IDEAS. -
Pingback: Sometimes the Conservative Movement Just Can’t Help Itself
Leave a Reply
Featured
Connect
Washington Informer
Advertisement
How dumb do you have to be to NOT know that this panel was idiotic. He's going to 'research' it NOW? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA