6:00pm February 9, 2012

Catholics, Contraceptives and Rubio’s Latino Contradiction


When Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced legislation last week to repeal part of the Affordable Care Act requiring some religious institutions to offer their employees contraceptive services through their health insurance coverage, he found himself again at odds with two key constituencies: Catholics and Latinas/os.

Just a few weeks ago, the junior senator from Florida was the target of a campaign to raise awareness about his positions on immigration that are at odds with most Latinos. But, his latest policy proposal on birth control highlights yet another disconnection with two key constituencies this election year.

Rubio has always been known for his opposition to abortion, but he has started to heighten his involvement in reproductive health politics with a series of new statements. Last week, he told Politico: “I can tell you that none of my children were planned.”

In an opinion piece in the New York Post, Senator Rubio wrote: “… this will force Catholic organizations to make an unacceptable choice: Ignore a major tenet of their faith, or not provide any insurance to their employees and be punished with a federal fine for violating ObamaCare’s mandate on employers.”

Interestingly, this week the media cited Rubio’s Catholicism as a factor in prompting him to take a stand on this issue – but his own religious affiliation has been the subject of debate because of ties to the Southern Baptist-associated Christ Fellowship church.

This tangential information may illustrate a strategic maneuver by Senator Rubio to appeal to both evangelical and Catholic constituencies in his state.

But, getting back to Catholics, most of them (58%) agree with the idea that employers should be required to provide their employees with health care plans that cover birth control. Additionally, 98% of sexually active Catholic women have used some form of contraception that is banned by the Vatican; this is roughly the same amount as sexually active women in the general population (99%). For sexually active Catholic Latinas, 96% have used some form of contraception that is banned by the Vatican. Catholic women are making decisions about their health – and independent of church leaders.

Jon O’Brien, the President of Catholics for Choice, provided Politic365 with some perspective on Senator Rubio’s bill. “This is a huge contradiction that Senator Rubio is putting forth in advancing such a draconian bill,” argues O’Brien. “Asking the state to intervene on behalf of an interest group, in this case Catholic Bishops, is contrary to the Republican idea of people being able to pursue their own decisions free from government interference.”

“Additionally, Rubio is not considering the freedom of conscience in Catholic belief — the idea that individuals must follow his or her own conscience. 98% of sexually active Catholic women have used some form of birth control; these women have followed their conscience in determining how to care for their health,” explained O’Brien.

The National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health has also weighed in on Senator Rubio’s bill and efforts to reverse contraceptive services being provided as a health benefit and how Latinas would be impacted.

Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, the executive director of the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health, told Politic365 that “… it seems that Senator Rubio has prioritized scoring political points over supporting and standing up for women’s health.”

“Studies show that Latinas are overwhelmingly in favor of access to preventative care, including contraception,” added Gonzalez-Rojas. “Rubio’s bill, which goes against recommendations made by the Department of Health and Human Services, allows any employer to deny access to contraceptive coverage, on the grounds of religious belief. This bill would deny millions of women the right to make their own decisions about preventative care.”

Gonzalez-Rojas also explained that 40% of Latinas live without health insurance and that many cite the cost of prescription birth control as interfering with their ability to use it consistently. Her organization views Rubio’s bill as explicitly restricting access to a health service for women instead of perceiving it as a policy that helps them.

“Senator Rubio’s bill conflicts with the needs of the Latino/a community. We urge him to drop this bill, and shift toward issues of critical importance to the Latino/a community, such as expanding, not limiting, access to critical health care,” Gonzalez-Rojas contends.

As his name continues to surface as a possible Vice Presidential candidate on the GOP ticket, especially as someone who could draw evangelical voters uneasy with a Mormon nominee like Mitt Romney, Catholics and Latinos (and especially the women in both groups) will wonder why Rubio has chosen to align himself with a small group of Bishops instead of the masses.

About the Author

Adriana Maestas
Adriana Maestas is the senior contributing editor of Politic365.com. The ideas and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author, and have complete editorial independence from any Politic365 partners, sponsors, or advertisers. For additional information about Politic365, please visit http://politic365.com/about/.



Marco Rubio to enter presidential race on April 13

According to a new report from Bloomberg, Florida Senator Marco Rubio will announce that he is going to enter the race to be the Republican nominee for president on April 13: “Senator Marco Rubio plans to announce his cam...
by Adriana Maestas


The Sunny Side of Florida Governor Rick Scott’s Budget

It’s budget time, and while the members of Florida’s Legislature evaluate competing plans in the state House and Senate, the Sunshine State’s Governor, Rick Scott, is championing a $77 billion proposal he insi...
by Politic365 Staff


Canadian born Ted Cruz to enter GOP race for president, let the birther stories begin

On Sunday, it was announced that Texas Senator Ted Cruz will launch his presidential campaign on Monday at Liberty University in Virginia. While Jeb Bush is “exploring” a run for president, Ted Cruz would be the fir...
by Adriana Maestas



We Commemorate Selma With Much Work to be Done

My father took me and my brothers with him to the polls when he voted for Barack Obama during his first campaign.  We were late to school, but he thought it was important for us to be there.  The second time around, I was a s...
by Brandon Patterson


Walmart Wage Increase Likely to Start New Trend Toward Pay Equity

Better schedules, more training, and a wage increase up to $10.00 per hour – that’s what Walmart workers can expect beginning on April 1. Last month, the world’s largest retailer announced that it was raising...
by Kristal High



  1. Well…as your article clearly states, Marco Rubio wants his cake and he wants to eat it too. This is what happens when the voters toss aside content of character traits, and vote for a duplicitous, cerebrally challenged, self-serving, superficial man. Someone please slap his mother! And Congress is filled with these types. Whatever happened to public integrity? Has Corporate America designated that behavioral trait to be out of fashion for U.S. Congressional Representatives? It’s bad enough paying tax dollars to support these public civil servants so out of touch with the 99%, but do we also have to tolerate such extreme stupidity and shamelessness from them too? Someone please slap his mother again.

  2. John

    Like many Catholics, I support the use of contraceptives and disagree with the Church on this issue. However, like most Catholics I object to any president of any party telling the Catholic church or any religion that they must violate their teachings. This right to freedom of religion is clearly and unambiguously detailed in our Constitution in the same section of the constitution that details our freedom of speech.

    Fortunately, those who wrote our Constitution were wise enough to give us a process for amending our Constitution. If Americans believe that religious institutions should do something that is contrary their teachings, then we should do this through the amendment process, not through any president's interpretation of a law. Based on the recent 9 to 0 US Supreme Court decision regarding religious institutions and employee discrimination, I expect the US Supreme Court will rule similarly on the contraception issue.

  3. [...] Catholics, Contraceptives and Rubio’s Latino Contradiction, Adriana Maestas, co-publisher of Daily Grito [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>