Thank Goodness the Seattle Welfare Queen Isn’t Black

Thank Goodness the Seattle Welfare Queen Isn’t Black


Authorities recently raided the home of a Seattle woman who allegedly used federal subsidy vouchers reserved for low income families to – get this – pay for her million dollar Lake Washington waterfront home.

Unsealed court documents revealed that since 2003, a woman who has social security benefits, welfare and food stamps, had been getting a monthly $1200 tax-payer subsidized check to pay towards her gorgeous, picturesque 2400 square feet home with big bay window valued at $1.2 Million.

The woman, Lyudmila Shimonva – a Russian native – and her Chiropractor husband David Silverstein (who drives around in luxury cars) have been scamming the American tax payer for the past eight years while traveling to places like Moscow, Turkey and Tel Aviv.

When news first broke, officials had not yet revealed the woman’s name.  But, by the names of the places she and her husband traveled to, folks may have held their collective breath hoping she wasn’t Black.

Had she and husband been Black, though, it wouldn’t take long for some enterprising presidential candidate (*cough*) Newt Gingrich (*cough*) to use her as an example of what’s wrong with our welfare state. He probably will – irrespective of her race – but it would get more mileage if she was a sister.

Clearly using racial code language, Newt has already called the President the “food stamp” and the “welfare” president because he says more people have signed up for it during Obama’s presidency.  The truth is, in this economy, more people have had to turn to the government for help.  Blacks are indeed on food stamps in disproportion to their race and, sadly for many, the phrase “low income,” “poor” and “urban” are synonymous with the term “Black” to many people.

It sure makes it easier to appeal to that fallacy than the truth in the minds of some people who have that misconception planted firmly in their brains, anyway.

It would align with Gingrich’s latest campaign rhetoric. Newt hasn’t held back in his attempt to dig deep and pull at the emotional strings of his conservative base who are fed up with subsidizing all these entitlement programs for poor people (*cough* of color) who don’t want to work but lay around all day having babies and collecting welfare checks.  No, he didn’t say it so bluntly, but string together all his explosive talking points of the past week or so and that’s, in sum, what he’s saying.

Last week, he caught some heat for suggesting that poor children have poor work ethic because they are surrounded by lazy adults who don’t want to work.

“Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works,” the former House speaker said at a campaign event at the Nationwide Insurance offices.

“So they literally have no habit of showing up on Monday. They have no habit of staying all day. They have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash,’ unless it’s illegal.”

While touting the Leave it to Beaver virtues of having a paper route and lemonade stand (because Newt had it), the former Speaker suggests easing child labor laws so poor kids can be janitors and clean toilets and scrub floors.  Ah yes – going back to the time of Charles Dickens.  Let the kids of wealthy connected people apply for and get $80,000 cushy gigs as Congressional pages while the poor kids clean their toilets. (The House has dismantled its program, citing that email has obliterated the need for pages to run bills back and forth to Members’ offices.  The Senate’s program remains)

It’s reminiscent of Ronald Regan’s welfare queen, a fictional conjured up reference to the Black woman bilking tax payers of money collecting welfare while driving a luxury car and living in a lavish home. Reagan referenced this made-up woman of 80 names, 30 addresses and 12 social security numbers during a speech in 1976 in the middle of the Republican primary. The effect was to convince voters that Democrats were letting these enterprising and scheming lazy Black folks bilk them out of millions while living better than they do. In the Seattle case, this welfare queen’s landlord was her doctor husband who used his office address as his home on forms as she used her maiden name.

And they would’ve gotten away with it longer had the husband not slipped up and put his correct address on a passport application and the whole plan unraveled.  Cue the Scooby Doo villain reveal reel now.

Raise your hand if you learned that the villains in this case were not Black because had they been, it would only be a matter of days, no hours, before some candidate seized on the opportunity to capitalize on it as a campaign talking point.


  1. It’s amazing how they can keep pointing at the people of color who are on welfare & food stamps when the statistics clearly show that more white people are using the system than blacks. Let’s remember when you point one finger out at some one or group, there are three more fingers pointing back at you. Your own. Let’s talk about the ratio of the whites on the system for a minute.

  2. I am happy to know that they aren’t black too! I was praying! Well, on the surface it seems they are not black. The only point I disagree with is the statement about being able to assume they are not black due to where they have traveled. This sister has traveled to those places and many other locations black folk overlook.

    • But you agree with the point then. You yourself say you are the anamoly and based on that, it would be reasonable to assume that most black folks (not all) would not travel to those locations. True?

      • No, I do not agree with the point. Most black folks don't travel overseas for many reasons, usually socioeconomic, and when they do travel they aren't interested in going to the Holy Land, Turkey, Russia, Dubai, etc. We tend to head straight for the Carribean, Mexico, and places like that. But there are many, many of us out there that are like me…so no, I don't feel as if I am an anamoly.

        • Not an anamoly on travel. An anomoly on travel to Russia and areas that Blacks don't head to. You are making the same argument as the author but you dont' seem to understand you are.

          You are saying that blacks don't travel to places like Russia. The author said the fact that the initial reports only indicated places traveled to would lead people to believe the woman was not Black.

          How do you say you disagree when you are arguing the point?

  3. How about the Family Court Child Support Scam. Doesn't matter what color you are.

    Mother's use the arm of the courts to enforce collections while fathers become bankrupt, destitute and commit suicide? The courts and the IRS are blind to race, but not money.
    They give terrorists and murderers more rights than single fathers.

    It's a shame that this couple bilked the Government out of all this money, because you and I have to supplement them as well as the more deserving welfare recipients every year.


  4. pretty lame column…and totally racist to boot; to assume that a reader–any reader would assume that (the welfare recipient in question) was/is black is the very definition of racist.

    what a laughably poor column–one finger pointed at the reader means three are pointed directly back at the writer.

      • "Clearly, you are not black because many many blacks agree with the author"

        up to the old racist tricks again, are we? you can tell i'm not black ("clearly") cuz i don't agree with "many, many blacks" ?

        i'll take that as a compliment.

        a racist one, of course, but a compliment nonetheless<——-do "many, many" black people use the term "nonetheless", or is that a dead give away that i'm "clearly not black"?

        thanks for proving my point, numtruck.

  5. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own weblog and was
    wondering what all is needed to get setup? I’m assuming having
    a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.

  6. I rarely leave remarks, however i did some searching and wound up here Thank Goodness the Seattle Welfare Queen Isn’t Black | Politic365.
    And I do have 2 questions for you if it’s allright.
    Is it only me or does it look like some of these remarks appear like they are
    coming from brain dead individuals? 😛 And,
    if you are posting at other places, I’d like to keep up with everything
    fresh you have to post. Could you make a list of all of your public sites like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?