4:00pm November 21, 2011

U.S. to China: Raise You a Hypersonic Bomb


In what is sure to excite everyone from war-mongering hawks to peace-loving hippies, the U.S. may have just developed a bomb that will end all threats and get our troops back on American soil.

When I first heard that taxpayer-financed R&D dollars at the Pentagon have resulted in the creation of a bomb that can be launched from any point on the planet to target any other spot on Earth – within an HOUR – my testosterone started pumping.  I’m no military strategist, but add the fact that the target will not even hear the missile coming and one term comes to mind: “game changer.”

The new Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW) project has created flying bombs capable of traveling up to 16,000 miles per hour, nearly 21 times the speed of sound, are fully maneuverable, and able to hit the other side of the planet more than 12,000 miles away in the time it takes to get Chinese takeout.  No, this is not a Sci-Fi Channel movie preview.

Lookout al-Qaeda: the only sounds you’re going to hear are the footsteps of your approaching 72 virgins.

But, with a price tag that has already hit $240 million this year ($69 million just on the recent AHW test), according to the Congressional Research Service, and a Defense budget that is expected to see drastic cuts in the near future, many are wondering whether or not we can afford these kinds of investments.

In reality, we can’t afford not to.

Although China and Russia aren’t considered enemies, they aren’t exactly staunch allies either.  Both continue to demonstrate just how badly they want to become dominant military superpowers.  Chinese defense spending has increased more than 10% each year over the last 20 years and is now expected to be close to $150 billion this year.  With that money they have managed to create their own stealth fighter jet, an aircraft carrier, an advanced naval fleet and and anti-ship missiles, all of which are threatening U.S. dominance in the Pacific.

Since 2000, Russia has more than doubled its defense spending, with plans to increase it by another 60% by 2013.  Russia further plans to update its military by investing more than $650 billion over the next decade.  Forget gold – I’m going to invest in Russian defense contractors.

Both countries’ spending pales in comparison to the U.S.’s yearly defense budget of nearly $700 billion, but the difference is where the money is spent.  As the U.S. defense budget has been targeted for cuts within programs designed to modernize and advance our fighting capabilities, China and Russia are spending the bulk of their dollars on doing the opposite.

Most consider worldwide stability dependent upon the U.S.’s military superiority over other countries. But what if our investments in military spending were spent more wisely, giving us a strategic advantage that doesn’t inherently create a fiscal and economic disadvantage?

Clearly that is the intent of the AHW program.  With the capability of accurately destroying enemy targets from safe locations back in the U.S., the need to maintain high troop levels across the globe can be reduced.  Even Cindy Sheehan and George W. Bush can agree on the benefits of this strategy.

I hear over and over the argument made that we need to outspend our enemies, no matter the cost.  At a time when our debt has reached more than $15 trillion, our military is spread thin in conflicts around the world, and the so-called “super committee” can’t get its act together, we have to make a choice between our national defense and our national economy.

In reality, however, the answer is not what we spend, but how we spend it.  The new AHW program may not be the be all and end all, but developments like this will help us maintain military dominance, decrease unnecessary spending in conflict theaters around the world, and is one of our last hopes for actually bringing our troops home without risking national security.

If nothing else, at least the U.S. can continue to brag that we have the biggest and baddest guns in the world.  As a member of the military, with thousands of my brothers and sisters overseas fighting enemies who wish they could say the same, that’s good enough for me.  (Cue patriotic song of your choice).

Justin Vélez-Hagan is Senior Contributing Writer and Commentator for Politic365.com.  He is also the National Executive Director of The National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce, an international developer of senior living facilities and a reservist in the U.S. Air Force.  He can be reached at Justin@Politic365.com.

About the Author

Justin Velez-Hagan
Justin Vélez-Hagan is Senior Contributing Writer and Commentator for Politic365.com. He is also the National Executive Director of The National Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce, an international developer of senior living facilities, and is a reservist in the U.S. Air Force. He can be reached at Justin@Politic365.com.



Net Metering Raises Inequity Concerns Amid Solar Transition

Many Americans like to say that “if you work hard, you’ll get ahead,” but fewer and fewer of us actually think so.  A recent poll found that only 42 percent of our fellow Americans agree with that statement, down from 53...
by Guest Contributor


Net Metering Means Minorities Are Getting the Short End of the Deal

This article first appeared on VOXXI. By Gus Portela Hiring is on the uptick, but its slow pace is leaving many struggling Americans in a lurch. As we head into election season, the debate over how to create more jobs and help ...
by Guest Contributor


Hispanic Wireless Users Survey: Fewer Taxes, More Spectrum

Recently McLaughlin & Associates partnered with Penn Schoen Berland to develop and conduct a bipartisan national online survey of 417 adult Hispanics, and the 2014 Hispanic Consumer Survey reveals a lot about Hispanic wirel...
by Politic365 Staff



Raising Black Sons in Light of…

By: Jolanda Jones As a single mom of a Black man, business owner, lawyer, former city council member, US Track & Field member, and human rights activist, I was asked to be an expert panelist, on our local television affilia...
by Guest Contributor


#GA123: The Children of Freedom Summer Will Soon Be Leaders of Freedom Fall

The seeds planted 50 years ago in Mississippi during Freedom Summer are in full bloom. The children of 1964 — who are now leaders — are positioned to energize this generation of young voters of color and progressive...
by Kirk Clay



  1. eddie

    good for us.usa military is the best

  2. jack

    That's just plain bad ass.

  3. Mark

    Sweet. Did not know about that weapon — indeed a game changer. Thanks for the revelation!

  4. Ast

    Russia already conceved a missile which go at mach6+ 25 years ago but the missile was never constructed due to the fall of USSR

    Russia has 25 years of advance get your facts

  5. Boss

    Hey Ass, sorry, I mean Ast, if that's the case then Russia's tech has fallen off the earth. Nor, did the author say that Russia didn't have or previously had similar techs.

  6. Rafael Sifuentes

    wow, some good news that continues to prove the US's commitment to maintaining military superiority. It does make me feel safe to know that our defense has not been completely gutted, yet. However, it doubles as encouragement that we are researching ways to finally not need as many military personnel in overseas contingencies. We have reduced our military fighting force to nearly half what it was in the 80s, while the chinese has increased it to nearly 60% more than ours, however, knowing that we can still remain as effective or more effective in our defense practices is extremely encouraging. Go USA!

  7. CLOX

    Ten year old news is not news. Get with the program. Not hypersonic, ballistic. Hypersonic has been studied for years and is further off than fusion power.

  8. Amir

    O yeah….we didn't have enough ways to kill people so we definitely need new one! I am getting disgusted by the world that we live in… human life is worth nothing these days and when we make look like it has some value, it is to punish and destroy some other life. Great progress!!! blah

  9. [...] If the Democratic proposal was slapped down, the Republican version was shot out of the sky with a hypersonic missile, garnering approval from only 22 [...]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>